In today's world, 2010 ATP World Tour Finals – Singles is a topic that has become increasingly relevant. Whether due to its impact on society, the economy or culture, 2010 ATP World Tour Finals – Singles has captured the attention of millions of people around the world. From its origins to the present, 2010 ATP World Tour Finals – Singles has generated debates, controversies and significant advances that have marked the history of humanity. In this article we will explore various aspects of 2010 ATP World Tour Finals – Singles, analyzing its importance, its implications and its evolution over time. Without a doubt, 2010 ATP World Tour Finals – Singles is a topic that leaves no one indifferent and that deserves to be studied and understood in its entirety.
Singles | |
---|---|
2010 ATP World Tour Finals | |
Champion | Roger Federer |
Runner-up | Rafael Nadal |
Score | 6–3, 3–6, 6–1 |
Roger Federer defeated Rafael Nadal in the final, 6–3, 3–6, 6–1 to win the singles tennis title at the 2010 ATP World Tour Finals. It was his fifth Tour Finals title. Nadal was attempting to complete the career Super Slam.
Tomáš Berdych was the only player to make his debut at the event.
Nikolay Davydenko was the reigning champion, but did not qualify this year.
Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||
1 | Rafael Nadal | 77 | 3 | 78 | |||||||||
5 | Andy Murray | 65 | 6 | 66 | |||||||||
1 | Rafael Nadal | 3 | 6 | 1 | |||||||||
2 | Roger Federer | 6 | 3 | 6 | |||||||||
2 | Roger Federer | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||
3 | Novak Djokovic | 1 | 4 |
Nadal | Djokovic | Berdych | Roddick | RR W–L | Set W–L | Game W–L | Standings | ||
1 | Rafael Nadal | 7–5, 6–2 | 7–6(7–3), 6–1 | 3–6, 7–6(7–5), 6–4 | 3–0 | 6–1 | 42–30 | 1 | |
3 | Novak Djokovic | 5–7, 2–6 | 6–3, 6–3 | 6–2, 6–3 | 2–1 | 4–2 | 31–24 | 2 | |
6 | Tomáš Berdych | 6–7(3–7), 1–6 | 3–6, 3–6 | 7–5, 6–3 | 1–2 | 2–4 | 26–33 | 3 | |
8 | Andy Roddick | 6–3, 6–7(5–7), 4–6 | 2–6, 3–6 | 5–7, 3–6 | 0–3 | 1–6 | 29–41 | 4 |
Standings are determined by: 1. number of wins; 2. number of matches; 3. in two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4. in three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5. steering-committee decision.
Federer | Söderling | Murray | Ferrer | RR W–L | Set W–L | Game W–L | Standings | ||
2 | Roger Federer | 7–6(7–5), 6–3 | 6–4, 6–2 | 6–1, 6–4 | 3–0 | 6–0 | 37–20 | 1 | |
4 | Robin Söderling | 6–7(5–7), 3–6 | 2–6, 4–6 | 7–5, 7–5 | 1–2 | 2–4 | 29–35 | 3 | |
5 | Andy Murray | 4–6, 2–6 | 6–2, 6–4 | 6–2, 6–2 | 2–1 | 4–2 | 30–22 | 2 | |
7 | David Ferrer | 1–6, 4–6 | 5–7, 5–7 | 2–6, 2–6 | 0–3 | 0–6 | 19–38 | 4 |
Standings are determined by: 1. number of wins; 2. number of matches; 3. in two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4. in three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5. steering-committee decision.