Belizean English

In the following article, we will explore Belizean English and its impact on our lives in detail. Belizean English is a topic that has captured the attention of many people in recent years, sparking debate and interest in a variety of fields and sectors. Throughout these pages, we will examine the different aspects and perspectives of Belizean English, addressing its historical relevance, its current situation and possible future implications. We hope that this article will be enlightening and stimulating, offering new ideas and approaches to Belizean English for our readers.

Belizean English
RegionBelize
Speakers184,000 (2014)
L2: 56,000 (2003)
Early forms
Standard forms
Standard Caribbean English[note 1]
Latin (English alphabet)
Official status
Official language in
Belize
Language codes
ISO 639-3
IETFen-BZ
Coordinates: 17°03′23″N 88°40′02″W / 17.056440603398805°N 88.66713935720784°W / 17.056440603398805; -88.66713935720784
This article contains IPA phonetic symbols. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Unicode characters. For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA.

Belizean English is the set of varieties of the English language spoken in Belize and by members of the Belizean diaspora.

History

The development of Caribbean English, including Belizean English, is dated to the West Indian exploits of Elizabethan sea dogs, which are credited with introducing to England names for Caribbean flora, fauna, and various other things via, for instance, Hakluyt's Principall Navigations of 1589 and Raleigh's Discoverie of the Empyre of Guiana of 1596. As English settlements followed shortly thereafter, Caribbean English has been deemed 'the oldest exportation of that language from its British homeland.'

Phonology

Pronunciation in Belizean English tends towards Caribbean English, except that the former is non-rhotic.[note 2]

In 2013, it was noted that spoken Belizean English is heavily influenced by Belizean Creole, as 'both the lexicon and syntactic constructions often follow creole.' The influence has been deemed strong enough to argue 'that spoken English is simply a register of creole, relexified and restructured through contact with mainstream English.'[note 3] However, it has been further noted that one may describe this phenomenon 'from the opposite perspective and claim creole to be a register of English.'

Lexicology

The largest proportion of the lexicon unique to Belizean English is thought to name local flora, fauna, and cuisine. Notably, the most significant donor language to this portion of Belizean English lexicon is thought to be the Miskito language, not Mayan languages, 'as might be expected.' Other donor languages include Mayan languages, African languages (via Jamaican English), and Spanish (particularly for cuisine).[note 4]

Sample of lexical items unique to Belizean English.[note 5]
Item PoS Gloss Notes
Agayuma p.n. water-spirit; like will o' the wisp or jack o' lantern fm. Garifuna; cf
alania n. beverage; made of grated cassava fm. Garifuna; cf
alcalde n. local government office; in Mayan settlements fm. Spanish; cf
alligator fish n. fish species; Belonesox belizanus cf
altamesa n. plant species cf
amapola / amopolla n. tree species; Pseudobombax ellipticum fm Spanish; cf
Anansi p.n. lead character in folk-tales fm Akan; cf
anansi n.
  • 1. spider
  • 2. someone who is sly or tricky
cf
antelope n. red brocket deer cf
apasote n. herb species; Dysphania ambrosioides fm Nahuatl; cf
apple banana n. banana cultivar cf
areba / ereba n. round flat bread; made of grated cassava fm Spanish; cf
axe-master n. tree species; Caesalpinia gaumeri cf
baboon n. howler monkey cf
baboon cap n. herb species; Couepia dodecandra cf

In 2013, it was noted that spelling in official contexts, such as in government, tended to follow British conventions, while that in commercial spaces tended to prefer American usage, with spelling in popular written media described as 'highly inconsistent, following the conventions of the writer.'[note 6]

Sociolinguistics

In 2017, it was noted that –

is highly contested among Belizeans and perceived as discrediting by most of – the status of exogamous 'proper' English is high and most of informants perceived the suggestion that there is an endogamous variety as almost offensive.

— Britta Schneider in 2017.

The aforementioned study suggested that such attitude towards Belizean English might be related to attitudes towards code-switching between English and Kriol, as the latter was described by the study's Belizean informants 'as an index for educational attainment and therefore for class, as it apparently requires formal training to learn to differentiate the two .' However, the social regard for exogamous dialects of English is thought to be decreasing in Belize, though this has been linked to a concomitant rise in the prestige of Belizean Creole, rather than that of Belizean English.[note 7]

Study

The earliest scholarly dictionary of Caribbean English is thought to have been the 1967 Dictionary of Jamaican English. During Easter of that same year, the Caribbean Association of Headmasters and Headmistresses resolved –

Be it resolved that this Association request the appropriate department of the University of the West Indies to compile a list of lexical items in each territory and to circulate these to schools for the guidance of teachers.

— Resolution 6 of the CAHH Conference of Easter 1967.

Said resolution was promptly forwarded to Richard Allsopp, who by mid-1967 'already had some ten shoe-boxes each of about 1,000 6 × 4 cards and many loose unfiled cuttings, notes and other material .' In 1971, Allsopp introduced the Caribbean Lexicography Project as 'a survey of usage in the intermediate and upper ranges of the West Indian speech continuum.' This set the stage for the seminal Dictionary of Caribbean English Usage, first published 1996.[note 8]

In 2013, it was noted that Belizean English may not constitute a single dialect. For instance, the English spoken in Garifuna-majority settlements in the southeastern coast of Belize 'includes distinctive borrowings which are not found elsewhere in the country.' It was further noted that, though Belizean English is not a tonal language, some of its words 'are not correctly pronounced unless the relative pitch heights are accurate.'

Notes and references

Explanatory footnotes

  1. ^

    Standard English is West Indian, generally somewhat creolised except in formal situations and in school.

    — Ammon et al. 2006, p. 2077
    However, Ammon et al. 2006, p. 2087 note that 'forms of language approximating Internationally Acceptable English exist in each territory , under local labels such as Standard Guyanese English, Standard Belizean English, etc., or under the regional label of Standard Caribbean English.' Standard Caribbean English is thought to be authoritatively described by the Dictionary of Caribbean English Usage, which defines the former as 'the literate English of educated nationals of Caribbean territories and their spoken English such as is considered natural in formal social contexts' (Ammon et al. 2006, pp. 2088–2089).
  2. ^ McArthur, Lam-McArthur & Fontaine 2018, entry on 'Caribbean English' describe the distinctive features of West Indian pronunciation as –
    1. rhythm tends to be syllable-timed,
    2. there are fewer diphthongs than in Received Pronunciation,
    3. final consonant clusters tend to be reduced,
    4. there is a preference for a clear /l/ in words like milk, fill, rather than the dark /l/ of Received Pronunciation.
  3. ^ Blench 2013, p. 2, for instance, recommends the treatment of Belizean English and Belizean Creole 'as registers of one another,' arguing that 'purely in dialectal terms this is simply not true, as the Creole and Belizean English share almost all their lexicon and grammar.' Further, Schneider 2017, p. 69 notes that 'it can be difficult to distinguish Kriol and English in structural terms.' Schneider 2017, p. 69 additionally observes 'a widespread insecurity when it comes to defining what is English and what is Kriol.' Schneider 2017, pp. 69–70 posits –

    It seems that in informal forms of everyday language practice, many speakers in Belize have developed a kind of fused lect where grammatical differences between the codes do not necessarily have a boundary marking function and where, therefore, it has become difficult to differentiate codes. Indeed, it can be maintained that what would elsewhere be regarded as non-standard forms (e.g. lack of subject-verb agreement) is appropriate, for example, in public governmental signage or in school signposts, while most of the lexical forms that are defined as Kriol in explicit language ideological discourse are in fact the same as in English, sometimes (but not always) with a slightly different pronunciation.

    — Schneider 2017, pp. 69–70
    Schneider 2017, pp. 69–70 go on to suggest that the English–Kriol boundary may be pragmatically marked by 'sound features like pitch, intonation and speed rhythm,' rather than by structural differences such as grammar.
  4. ^ African languages, however, are deemed the most significant donor languages to Caribbean English (Allsopp 2003, p. xxxii).
  5. ^ Some lexical items may be common to other dialects of Caribbean English, eg Jamaican English. Note, PoS, p.n, n. stand for Part of Speech, proper noun, noun.
  6. ^ Allsopp 2003, p. xix observed that over 90 per cent of dictionaries used in the West Indies, including Belize, were published in England.
  7. ^ However, the former is popularly regarded by Belizeans as 'a dialect of English' (Schneider 2021, pp. 32, 35). Further, (Schneider 2021, pp. 31–32) posits that this association with English may partly explain Kriol's increasing prestige.
  8. ^ Allsopp 2003, p. xxxi likens the publication to that of Webster's in 1828, the Dictionary of Canadian English in 1967, and the Australian National Dictionary in 1988.

Short citations

  1. ^ a b Eberhard, Simons & Fennig 2022, country digest for Belize.
  2. ^ Ammon et al. 2006, p. 2077.
  3. ^ Ammon et al. 2006, pp. 2077, 2084.
  4. ^ Allsopp 2003, p. xl.
  5. ^ Allsopp 2003, pp. xl–xli.
  6. ^ McArthur, Lam-McArthur & Fontaine 2018, entry on 'Caribbean English'.
  7. ^ a b c d e f Blench 2013, p. 2.
  8. ^ a b Schneider 2017, p. 63.
  9. ^ a b c Blench 2013, p. 3.
  10. ^ Allsopp 2003, pp. xli–xlii.
  11. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Blench 2013, p. 6.
  12. ^ a b c Blench 2013, p. 7.
  13. ^ a b Schneider 2017, p. 71.
  14. ^ Schneider 2021, pp. 29–30.
  15. ^ Allsopp 2003, p. xx.
  16. ^ Allsopp 2003, pp. xx–xxi.
  17. ^ a b Allsopp 2003, p. xxi.
  18. ^ Ammon et al. 2006, p. 2088.
  19. ^ Allsopp 2003, pp. catalogue page, xxii.

Full citations

  1. Allsopp, Richard, ed. (2003). Dictionary of Caribbean English Usage. Kingston: University of the West Indies Press. ISBN 9789766401450. ProQuest 2352573179.
  2. Allsopp, Richard, ed. (2010). New register of Caribbean English usage. Kingston: University of the West Indies Press. ISBN 9789766402280. OCLC 535494345.
  3. Ammon, Ulrich; Dittmar, Norbert; Mattheier, Klaus J.; Trudgill, Peter, eds. (2006). Sociolinguistics : An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society. Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Sciences; 3.3. Vol. 3 (2nd completely revised and extended ed.). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110184181.3. ISBN 9783110199871. OCLC 174262379.
  4. Blench, Roger (15 March 2013). A Dictionary of Belize English. Draft circulated for comment. Archived from the original on 29 January 2022.
  5. Eberhard, David M.; Simons, Gary F.; Fennig, Charles D., eds. (2022). Ethnologue : Languages of the World (25th ed.). Dallas, TX: SIL International.
  6. Gorlach, Manfred; Holm, John A., eds. (1986). Focus on the Caribbean. Varieties of English around the world; General series; v. 8. Berlin; New York: John Benjamins Publishing Co. ISBN 9027248664. OCLC 14588593.
  7. Holm, John, ed. (1983). Central American English. Varieties of English around the world : Text ser.; 2. Heidelberg: Julius Groos. ISBN 3872762958. OCLC 9818255.
  8. McArthur, Tim; Lam-McArthur, Jacqueline; Fontaine, Lisa, eds. (2018). The Oxford Companion to the English Language (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acref/9780199661282.001.0001. ISBN 9780191744389.
  9. Ogilvie, Sarah, ed. (2020). The Cambridge companion to English dictionaries. Cambridge companions to literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108553780. ISBN 9781108553780. S2CID 243603808.
  10. Rodríguez González, Félix, ed. (1996). Spanish loanwords in the English language : a tendency towards hegemony reversal. Topics in English Linguistics : 18. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ISBN 3110148455. OCLC 34029435.
  11. Schneider, Britta (Spring 2017). "'It's Kriol they're speaking!' – Constructing Language Boundaries in Multilingual and Ethnically Complex Communities". Bulletin VALS-ASLA. No. spécial t. 1: 63–73. ISSN 1023-2044. oai:doc.rero.ch:20170502121737-NX.
  12. Schneider, Britta (March 2021). "Creole prestige beyond modernism and methodological nationalism : Multiplex patterns, simultaneity and non-closure in the sociolinguistic economy of a Belizean village". Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages. 36 (1): 12–45. doi:10.1075/jpcl.00068.sch. S2CID 230576173.
  13. Schneider, Edgar W.; Kortmann, Bernd, eds. (2004). A Handbook of Varieties of English : A Multimedia Reference Tool. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ISBN 3110175320. OCLC 56880203.
  14. Wells, John C., ed. (1982). Beyond the British Isles. Accents of English. Vol. 3. Berlin; New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521242258. OCLC 7578097.