In today's world, Droseridites is a topic that continues to generate interest and debate. Whether because of its impact on society, its relevance in history, or its influence on popular culture, Droseridites remains a topic of great importance today. Much has been researched and written about Droseridites over the years, and its relevance has not diminished in the slightest. From its origins to its implications in the modern world, Droseridites continues to be the subject of studies and research in different disciplines. In this article, we will explore different aspects of Droseridites and its importance in today's world.

Temporal range:
Photomicrographs of D. echinosporus pollen taken at 1000× magnification
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Angiosperms
Clade: Eudicots
Order: Caryophyllales
Family: Droseraceae (?)
Genus: Droseridites
Cookson (1947) ex R.Potonié (1960)
Type species
Droseridites spinosus
(Cookson) R.Potonié (1960)
  • Droseridites baculatus Ibrahim (1996)
  • Droseridites echinosporus R.Potonié (1954)
  • Droseridites major Krutzsch (1970)
  • Droseridites parvus Dutta & Sah (1970)
  • Droseridites senonicus Jardiné & Magloire (1965)
  • Droseridites spinosus (Cookson) R.Potonié (1960)

Droseridites is a genus of extinct plants of possible droseracean or nepenthacean affinity. It is a form taxon known only from fossil pollen. Species assigned to this genus originate from numerous regions of the world, including Europe (from France to the Caucasus), India, Egypt, the Arabian Peninsula, and the Kerguelen Islands.

This genus is characterised by inaperturate and spinose pollen grains that are united in loose tetrahedral tetrads (groups of four). The grains are prolate, striate, and tricolpate. The colpi are slender and long, whereas the striae are very fine, densely packed, and situated parallel to the polar axis.


Droseridites spinosus, the type species, has been recorded from the Tertiary of the Kerguelen Islands and the Miocene of India, including the Warkalli Formation (Bharathi and Kundra Clay Mines, Kerala) and the Sindhudurg Formation (Mavli Mine at Redi, Sindhudurg District, Maharashtra). It is of possible nepenthacean affinity. Specimens identified in the literature as D. cf. spinosus have also been reported from Hungarian Miocene deposits.

Droseridites baculatus was described from the Ghazalat-1 Well, Qattara Depression, Egypt.

Droseridites echinosporus has been recorded from European Tertiary strata and is a member of a group of similar species that have been interpreted as belonging to the genus Nepenthes.

Sites for D. major, a possible nepenthacean species, include the Tertiary of Europe and the Palaeocene-early Eocene Rekmangiri Coalfield of Garo Hills, Meghalaya, India.

Droseridites parvus was originally described from the lower Eocene Cherry Formation of Assam, India. It has also been recorded from the Palaeocene Tura Formation of the "Retialetes emendatus zone" in Assam and the Oligocene-Neogene Dharmsala and Siwalik (Dharmsala and Nurpur areas, Kangra District, Himachal Pradesh). The species is characterised by wart-like sculpturing and is "presently impossible to interpret".

Pollen matching the description of D. senonicus has been found in formations of the Arabian Peninsula dating to as early as the Middle Cretaceous to late Upper Cretaceous, and it has been suggested that this species may represent an early palm taxon.

Unidentified Droseridites palynomorphs have been recorded from numerous sites in India, including the Miocene Cuddalore Formation (Neyveli Lignitefield, Tamil Nadu), the Palaeocene Tura Formation (Langrin Coalfield, Khasi Hills, Meghalaya), the Palaeocene Seam No. 1 (Rekmangiri Coalfield, Garo Hills, Meghalaya), and the Oligocene-Neogene Dharmsala and Siwalik.


Pollen of a number of species originally described under the genus Droseridites has been tentatively assigned to Nepenthes. In 1985, Wilfried Krutzsch transferred three species of the "D. echinosporus group", creating the new combinations Nepenthes echinatus, N. echinosporus, and N. major. However, at more than 40 μm in diameter, the tetrads of D. major are larger than those of any known extant Nepenthes, and within the lower range of extant Drosera tetrads. Pollen from the Kerguelen Islands originally described as D. spinosus has also been interpreted as belonging to Nepenthes.

Some authors consider D. major and D. parvus as synonyms of Nepenthidites laitryngewensis of the Palaeocene Lakadong Sandstone in Laitryngew, Khasi Hills, Meghalaya, India.


  1. ^ a b c d e Krutzsch, W. 1985. Über Nepenthes-Pollen im europäischen Tertiär. Gleditschia 13: 89–93.
  2. ^ a b c d e f Saxena, R.K. & G.K. Trivedi 2006. "A Catalogue of Tertiary Spores and Pollen from India" (PDF). Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeobotany, Lucknow.
  3. ^ a b Ibrahim, M.I.A. 1996. Aptian-Turonian palynology of the Ghazalat-1 Well (GTX-1), Qattara Depression, Egypt. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 94(1–2): 137–168. doi:10.1016/0034-6667(95)00135-2
  4. ^ a b c d e f g Ehrendorfer, F. 1989. Woody Plants—Evolution and Distribution Since the Tertiary. Springer-Verlag, Vienna.
  5. ^ a b c Meimberg, H., A. Wistuba, P. Dittrich & G. Heubl 2001. Molecular phylogeny of Nepenthaceae based on cladistic analysis of plastid trnK intron sequence data. Plant Biology (Stuttgart) 3(2): 164–175. doi:10.1055/s-2001-12897
  6. ^ Baksi, S.K. & U. Deb 1976. On Mulleripollis gen. nov., a pollen tetrad from the Upper Cretaceous of the Bengal Basin, West Bengal, India. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 22(1): 73–77. doi:10.1016/0034-6667(76)90012-9
  7. ^ Krutzsch, W. 1989. Paleogeography and historical phytogeography (paleochorology) in the Neophyticum. Plant Systematics and Evolution 162(1–4): 5–61. doi:10.1007/BF00936909
  8. ^ a b Cheek, M.R. & M.H.P. Jebb 2001. Nepenthaceae. Flora Malesiana 15: 1–157.
  9. ^ Heubl, G., G. Bringmann & H. Meimberg 2006. Molecular phylogeny and character evolution of carnivorous plant families in Caryophyllales — revisited. Plant Biology 8(6): 821–830. doi:10.1055/s-2006-924460
  10. ^ Kumar, M. 1995. Pollen tetrads from Palaeocene sediments of Meghalaya, India: comments on their morphology, botanical affinity and geological records. Palaeobotanist 43(1): 68–81.