Editorial independence

In this article we are going to address the topic of Editorial independence, which is of utmost importance and interest to a wide spectrum of readers. Editorial independence has become a topic of discussion and debate in recent times, being the subject of analysis by experts in the field. Through this article, we seek to provide a comprehensive and detailed view of Editorial independence, addressing its most relevant aspects and offering valuable information to understand its impact in various areas. From its origin to its current evolution, Editorial independence has aroused the interest of professionals, academics and the general public, so it is relevant to investigate its nature and consequences. Through an analytical and rigorous approach, we aim to explore and deepen this topic, presenting diverse perspectives and arguments that enrich knowledge about Editorial independence. Without a doubt, this article aspires to be an informative and reflective reference for those who wish to fully understand this phenomenon.

Editorial independence is the freedom of editors to make decisions without any interference from the owners of a publication.

Editorial independence is tested, for instance, if a newspaper runs articles that may be unpopular with its advertising clientele or critical of its ownership.

"The media has increasingly grown to rely on automated decision-making to produce and distribute news. This trend challenges our understanding of editorial independence ..."

The German Wikipedia contains the following definitions of levels of analysis regarding media related legal frameworks:

Polity means constitution of communications.

Politics means input by political agents.

Policies means output of laws, treaties, decisions, authorities etc.

See also

Related controversies

External links

Medienpolitik

What is Editorial Independence and How Does It Impact Publishing?

References

  1. ^ Drunen, Max van (2021-09-13). "Editorial independence in an automated media system". Internet Policy Review. 10 (3). ISSN 2197-6775.
  2. ^ Hans J. Kleinsteuber (ed.): Aktuelle Medientrends in den USA. Journalismus, politische Kommunikation und Medien im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung. Wiesbaden 2001, ISBN 3-531-13494-9.
  3. ^ "Blowing the Whistle On Your Own Station". Columbia Journalism Review. March 1, 2001. Retrieved 2008-09-10.
  4. ^ Schweitzer, Sarah (August 19, 2000). "Reporter wins suit over firing". St. Petersburg Times. Retrieved 2008-09-10.
  5. ^ "The media can legally lie". St. Louis Journalism Review. December 1, 2004. Retrieved 2008-09-10.