Template talk:Family
This article will address the topic of Template talk:Family, which has gained great relevance in recent times due to its impact on various areas of daily life. Since its emergence, Template talk:Family has aroused great interest among experts and the general public, generating debates, research and creating new opportunities in different sectors. Throughout this writing, different aspects related to Template talk:Family will be analyzed, exploring its origins, evolution and its influence on current society. In addition, different perspectives and approaches will be examined to further understand the importance and scope of Template talk:Family today.
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Family template. |
|
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
,_early_1900s,_Central_Africa,_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo,_Pende_people,_wood,_fiber_-_Cleveland_Museum_of_Art_-_DSC08700.JPG){kind=small}
Stepfamily
How about adding "Stepfamily"? eu.stefan (talk) 20:46, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:23, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Template:Western kinship → Template:Family — Makes much more sense to just use the simpler template title of *Family". Then redirect Template:Western kinship to Template:Family instead of the other way round.--Penbat (talk) 20:26, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.