In today's world, Template talk:Life, non-cellular life, and comparable structures continues to be a topic of great relevance and interest. Throughout history, Template talk:Life, non-cellular life, and comparable structures has had a significant impact on different aspects of society, culture and everyday life. In this article, we will explore in detail the importance of Template talk:Life, non-cellular life, and comparable structures, as well as its influence in various areas. From its origin to its evolution today, Template talk:Life, non-cellular life, and comparable structures has generated endless debates, research and reflections that have contributed to enriching our knowledge on this topic. Through a deep and thoughtful analysis, we will try to shed light on the most relevant aspects of Template talk:Life, non-cellular life, and comparable structures and its relevance in the contemporary world.
Tree of Life Template‑class | |||||||
|
I would like to delete prion from this template, as these protein (polypeptides) particles are not living nor considered living by any fringe research group. BatteryIncluded (talk) 13:34, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Shouldn't the nanobes and nanobacteria be added to this template (... and comparable organic structers) in some way? Pinoczet (talk) 00:46, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Hey, Why is there a question mark after Nanobe? Is it because the classification is debated? Thank you so much! Sincerely, JuxtaposedJacob (talk) 00:39, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Same question. I think we should take it out or clarify what it supposed to mean.
Update: Hi, @Ypna:! It seems to be your 2020 diff. Do we need this "?" sign? Thank you. Evilfreethinker (talk) 16:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC)