In today's world, Template talk:List of writing systems is a highly relevant topic that continues to generate interest and debate. From its origins to its impact today, Template talk:List of writing systems has been the subject of study and analysis in different areas. Its influence on society, its evolution over time and its role in people's daily lives are aspects that have aroused the curiosity of experts and fans alike. In this article, we will explore the impact of Template talk:List of writing systems in depth, analyzing its importance, its repercussions and the different perspectives that exist on this topic. Through a multidisciplinary approach, we will try to shed light on key aspects related to Template talk:List of writing systems, providing a complete and nuanced view.
Lists Template‑class | |||||||
|
Writing systems Template‑class | |||||||
|
I am sorry for my revert, but the recent expansion adds extreme clutter. This template is transcluded from a large number of pages. If you want to create a giant "list of scripts" template, please do it under an alternative title (and select a limited number of articles where transclusion may be appropriate). dab (𒁳) 14:52, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the Klingon alphabets under Alphabets - Linear. Thank you. 1.127.108.26 (talk) 16:22, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Can we please have these neologisms removed from the template? Wikipedia is the only website that uses these terms, they are NOT listed in ANY dictionary. Clearly some editor has devised these words and decided to impose their neologism upon everyone else. It's utterly ludicrous for Wikipedia to use a neologism that no user can possibly find the meaning for. 1.157.95.133 (talk) 16:43, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove "somacheirograms" and replace it with "others" or "sign languages". "somacheirographic" and "somacheirogram" aren't real words and they are not listed in ANY dictionary. It is absolutely ludicrous for Wikipedia to use neologisms, especially neologisms with no actual dictionary definition. How is a user supposed to understand what is being said when a hitherto unused and unheard-of word is used, especially when a far less ambiguous term could be used like "sign languages'. 1.157.95.133 (talk) 16:47, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1.157.95.133 (talk) 16:47, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change Coorgi–Cox_alphabet from the Alphabets section to the Abugidas section, as it is not an alphabet despite the name. 2405:6581:A9A0:2E00:A1EC:DEA2:DDEE:107 (talk) 11:12, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
It's definitely not a comprehensive list of what writing systems are currently used. It seems strange to single these ones out, and also has political undertones. I think it might be better to not have a section like this.--Yellow Diamond Δ Direct Line to the Diamonds 23:05, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Sunuwar alphabet added to alphabets Aonadh nan Gaidheal (talk) 17:53, 13 February 2023 (UTC)