In this article, we will thoroughly explore the topic of Template talk:Pathology and how it has impacted different aspects of society. From its emergence to its evolution over time, Template talk:Pathology has been the subject of debate and controversy, but it has also been a source of inspiration and change. We will analyze its influence on culture, politics, economics and other areas, as well as its role in the formation of identity and community. Through a multidisciplinary approach, we will examine the various perspectives that exist on Template talk:Pathology, seeking to understand its scope and meaning in the current context. Likewise, we will examine whether Template talk:Pathology has a positive or negative impact on society and how it can be understood through different theoretical and methodological approaches. Ultimately, this article aims to provide a complete and balanced view of Template talk:Pathology, so that the reader can form an informed opinion on this topic.
Medicine: Pathology Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
Hi all, what would the opinions be about branching some of the content off this template? I think this section should be moved to a separate template:
The reason is that it stands out like a sore thumb amongst the rest of this template, which is much more general in form, describing pathology and subspecialities. The content above really relates to either General histopathology findings or Cellular pathophysiology . I'm sure there are better titles to both but I hope I convey my point - these relate to the responses of cells to stress or injury and are better placed in a separate template. That template can also include some additional helpful links like fibrosis etc. So, to summarise my two questions are:
Ping to Spicy who may have an opinion here. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC)