Wikipedia:Consensus dos and don'ts

In today's world, Wikipedia:Consensus dos and don'ts is a topic that generates great interest and debate in different areas. For years, Wikipedia:Consensus dos and don'ts has been a source of fascination and study. Currently, the importance of Wikipedia:Consensus dos and don'ts has taken on a new role due to recent advances and discoveries in this field. Whether from a scientific, social, technological or cultural perspective, Wikipedia:Consensus dos and don'ts is a topic that continues to arouse curiosity and generate multiple questions. In this article, we will explore in detail the various facets and aspects related to Wikipedia:Consensus dos and don'ts, with the aim of providing a comprehensive and enriching vision of this topic that is so relevant today.

Wikipedia information page

This is an information page. It is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines; rather, its purpose is to explain certain aspects of Wikipedia:Consensus. It may reflect differing levels of consensus and vetting.

Shortcut WP:CONDD

Consensus is Wikipedia's fundamental model for editorial decision-making: when it doesn't work, nothing else does either.

In situations involving consensus:

DO: Be familiar with relevant policies, guidelines, and past discussions Follow the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle Challenge consensus at the right venue(s) Neutrally ask for more opinions when needed Take intractable disputes to the right dispute resolution process	DON'T: Don't pretend a consensus you disagree with doesn't exist! Don't use local consensus to ignore wider consensus Don't close contentious discussions that you participated in Don't canvass for support of your position Don't use tendentious editing to get your way

See also

• Simple rule set