In today's world, 1906 Michigan gubernatorial election has become a topic of great relevance and interest to an increasingly broad audience. The importance of 1906 Michigan gubernatorial election lies in its impact on various aspects of society, from the economy to culture, politics and the environment. 1906 Michigan gubernatorial election has generated debate and controversy, and has even been the subject of research and studies that seek to understand it in its entirety. In this article, we will explore different facets of 1906 Michigan gubernatorial election, analyzing its meaning, its evolution over time, and its influence on the world today. In addition, we will examine possible solutions and alternatives to the challenges that 1906 Michigan gubernatorial election presents, with the aim of offering a comprehensive and updated vision on this topic of global relevance.
![]() | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
![]() County results Warner: 40–50% 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% 80–90% >90% Kimmerle: 40–50% | |||||||||||||||||
|
Elections in Michigan |
---|
![]() |
The 1906 Michigan gubernatorial election was held on November 6, 1906. Incumbent Republican Fred M. Warner defeated Democratic candidate Charles H. Kimmerle with 60.88% of the vote.
Major party candidates
Other candidates
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | Fred M. Warner (incumbent) | 227,567 | 60.88 | |
Democratic | Charles H. Kimmerle | 130,018 | 34.78 | |
Prohibition | R. Clark Reed | 9,139 | 2.45 | |
Socialist | James E. Walker | 5,925 | 1.59 | |
Socialist Labor | Herman Richter | 1,153 | 0.21 | |
Write-ins | 4 | 0.00 | ||
Total votes | 373,806 | 100 | ||
Republican hold |