In today's world, 1967 Australian referendum (Parliament) has become a topic of great relevance and interest to a wide variety of people. Whether due to its impact on society, its historical relevance, its importance in the scientific field or its influence on popular culture, 1967 Australian referendum (Parliament) has captured the attention of millions around the world. This article seeks to thoroughly explore all aspects related to 1967 Australian referendum (Parliament), analyzing its impact in different areas and offering a comprehensive and in-depth vision of this fascinating topic. From its origins to its current relevance, this article aims to provide a complete and detailed perspective on 1967 Australian referendum (Parliament), offering readers a broader and richer understanding of this phenomenon.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Question 1 Do you approve the proposed law for the alteration of the Constitution entitled— 'An Act to alter the Constitution so that the number of members of the House of Representatives may be increased without necessarily increasing the number of Senators'? | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Results by county |
The first part of the 1967 Australian referendum to change the Constitution was the Parliament question, which related to the relative number of members in each house of the Australian Parliament − the so-called "nexus". The 1967 Australian referendum called by the Holt government on 27 May 1967 consisted of two parts, with the second question relating to Aboriginal Australians.
Section 24 of the Australian Constitution requires that the number of members in the House of Representatives be, as nearly as possible, twice the number of members in the Senate. The most important effect of the "nexus" in the Australian Constitution is to prevent the dilution of the collective voting power of the Senate, which represents the Australian states equally, in any joint sitting of both houses following a double dissolution election. The nexus ensures that Senators will always have about one-third of the votes in a joint sitting, and Members of the House of Representatives about two-thirds. The referendum question asked the public to vote on whether "the number of members of the House of Representatives may be increased without necessarily increasing the number of Senators". It was defeated, with 59.75% of voters voting "No" to this question.
Do you approve the proposed law for the alteration of the Constitution entitled 'An Act to alter the Constitution so that the number of members of the House of Representatives may be increased without necessarily increasing the number of Senators'?