1972 Labour Party deputy leadership election
Nowadays, 1972 Labour Party deputy leadership election is a topic that has captured the attention of many people around the world. With the increasing importance of 1972 Labour Party deputy leadership election in today's society, it is crucial to understand its impact on various areas of daily life. From the personal to the professional level, 1972 Labour Party deputy leadership election has proven to be a determining factor in decision making and strategy development. In this article, we will explore the influence of 1972 Labour Party deputy leadership election in different contexts and analyze its relevance in today's world. From its origins to its impact today, 1972 Labour Party deputy leadership election has had a great influence on the way we face the challenges of modern society.
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.jpg)
The 1972 Labour Party deputy leadership election took place in April 1972 after Roy Jenkins resigned as deputy leader over the decision to hold a referendum on Britain's entry into the Common Market.
Edward Short, formerly Education Secretary in the government of Harold Wilson, was regarded as a "unity" candidate, and won the election over his main rival, the left-winger Michael Foot, who had unsuccessfully stood for the deputy leadership in 1970 and 1971.
Candidates
- Anthony Crosland, Shadow Secretary of State for Environment, Member of Parliament for Great Grimsby
- Michael Foot, Shadow Leader of the House of Commons, Member of Parliament for Ebbw Vale
- Edward Short, Shadow Secretary of State for Education and Science, Member of Parliament for Newcastle upon Tyne Central
Results
| First ballot: 20 April 1972 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate | Votes | % | |
| Edward Short | 111 | 39.4 | |
| Michael Foot | 110 | 39.0 | |
| Anthony Crosland | 61 | 21.6 | |
| Second ballot required | |||
As a result of the first round, Crosland was eliminated. The remaining two candidates would face each other in a second round. The next day's The Glasgow Herald reported that both Short and Crosland attracted more votes than had been expected and that Short was the favourite to pick up most of Crosland's votes.
| Second ballot: 25 April 1972 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate | Votes | % | |
| Edward Short | 145 | 55.6 | |
| Michael Foot | 116 | 44.4 | |
| Edward Short elected | |||
Reporting on the result, The Glasgow Herald's political correspondent John Warden stated that Short was "reckoned to be the least divisive of the three candidates for the post". The same report noted that Short called for "unity and toleration in the Labour Party" in the wake of his victory. An editorial in the same newspaper argued the result was a foregone conclusion after the first ballot, but warned that be settling for a compromise candidate "Labour may not have solved their difficulties".
References
- ^ "How Labour can learn from Roy Jenkins". The Guardian, 4 January 2013. Accessed 26 October 2014
- ^ Obituary: Lord Glenamara, The Daily Telegraph, 11 May 2012. Accessed 26 October 2014
- ^ Warden, John (21 April 1972). "Short leads by one vote in first ballot". The Glasgow Herald. p. 1. Retrieved 18 March 2021.
- ^ Warden, John (26 April 1972). "Unity call as Short wins by 29 votes". The Glasgow Herald. p. 1. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
- ^ "Compromise?". The Glasgow Herald. 26 April 1972. p. 10. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
Sources
- http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~tquinn/labour_party_deputy.htm Archived 17 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
  | This United Kingdom election-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |