This article will address the issue of 1976 Commercial Union Assurance Masters – Singles, which has become a topic of great relevance today. For some years now, 1976 Commercial Union Assurance Masters – Singles has aroused great interest in different areas, being the subject of debate, analysis and reflection by experts and scholars. Its influence and impact on today's society has led to numerous studies, research and projects being dedicated to it in various fields, seeking to understand its multiple facets and effects. Therefore, this article aims to explore and delve into the different dimensions that surround 1976 Commercial Union Assurance Masters – Singles, in order to offer a broad and complete vision of this topic that is so relevant today.
Singles | |
---|---|
1976 Commercial Union Assurance Masters | |
Champion | Manuel Orantes |
Runner-up | Wojciech Fibak |
Score | 5–7, 6–2, 0–6, 7–6, 6–1 |
Draw | 8 |
Manuel Orantes defeated Wojciech Fibak in the final, 5–7, 6–2, 0–6, 7–6, 6–1 to win the singles title at the 1976 Commercial Union Assurance Masters.
Ilie Năstase was the defending champion, but did not participate this year.
Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||
Harold Solomon | 4 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||||
Manuel Orantes | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
Manuel Orantes | 5 | 6 | 0 | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Wojciech Fibak | 7 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Guillermo Vilas | 2 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Wojciech Fibak | 6 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 8 |
Solomon | Gottfried | Ramírez | Vilas | RR W–L |
Set W–L |
Game W–L |
Standings | ||
Harold Solomon | 6–4, 6–2 | 6–2, 6–2 | 3–6, 6–4, 4–6` | 2–1 | 5–2 | 37–26 | 2 | ||
Brian Gottfried | 4–6, 2–6 | 4–6, 6–3, 6–0 | 6–3, 2–6, 6–4 | 2–1 | 4–4 | 36–34 | 3 | ||
Raúl Ramírez | 2–6, 2–6 | 6–4, 3–6, 0–6 | 6–7, 6–2, 5–7 | 0–3 | 2–6 | 30–44 | 4 | ||
Guillermo Vilas | 6–3, 4–6, 6–4 | 3–6, 6–2, 4–6 | 7–6, 2–6, 7–5 | 2–1 | 5–4 | 45–44 | 1 |
Standings are determined by: 1. number of wins; 2. number of matches; 3. in two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4. in three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5. steering-committee decision.
Fibak | Orantes | Dibbs | Tanner | RR W–L |
Set W–L |
Game W–L |
Standings | ||
Wojciech Fibak | 7–5, 7–6 | 6–2, 6–4 | 6–7, 3–6 | 2–1 | 4–2 | 35–30 | 2 | ||
Manuel Orantes | 5–7, 6–7 | 6–4, 6–2 | 7–6, 6–3 | 2–1 | 4–2 | 36–29 | 1 | ||
Eddie Dibbs | 2–6, 4–6 | 4–6, 2–6 | 6–4, 7–5 | 1–2 | 2–4 | 25–33 | 3 | ||
Roscoe Tanner | 7–6, 6–3 | 6–7, 3–6 | 4–6, 5–7 | 1–2 | 2–4 | 31–35 | 4 |
Standings are determined by: 1. number of wins; 2. number of matches; 3. in two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4. in three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5. steering-committee decision.