In this article, we will analyze the impact that 1987 Nabisco Masters – Singles has had on various aspects of society. Since its appearance, 1987 Nabisco Masters – Singles has generated great interest and debate in different areas, and it is important to study its influence on culture, economy, politics and other relevant aspects. Throughout this article, we will examine how 1987 Nabisco Masters – Singles has transformed the way people interact, changed dynamics within certain industries, and brought about significant shifts in the collective mindset. Through comprehensive analysis, we will attempt to better understand the global impact of 1987 Nabisco Masters – Singles and its role in the evolution of modern society.
Singles | |
---|---|
1987 Nabisco Masters | |
Champion | Ivan Lendl |
Runner-up | Mats Wilander |
Score | 6–2, 6–2, 6–3 |
Draw | 8 |
Two-time defending champion Ivan Lendl successfully defended his title, defeating Mats Wilander in the final, 6–2, 6–2, 6–3 to win the singles title at the 1987 Nabisco Masters.
In this year, the semifinal pairings were decided by a racket spin. This resulted in the two first placed players of each group playing each other again; in the case of Stefan Edberg and Wilander, for the second time in 24 hours (Edberg won the round robin match, but Wilander won the semifinal the following day).
Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||
1 | Ivan Lendl | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||
8 | Brad Gilbert | 2 | 4 | ||||||||||||
1 | Ivan Lendl | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||
3 | Mats Wilander | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||||||||
2 | Stefan Edberg | 2 | 6 | 3 | |||||||||||
3 | Mats Wilander | 6 | 4 | 6 |
Lendl | Gilbert | Connors | Becker | RR W–L |
Set W–L |
Game W–L |
Standings | ||
1 | Ivan Lendl | 6–2, 6–2 | 4–3, r | 6–4, 6–7, 6–3 | 3–0 | 4–1 | 34–21 | 1 | |
8 | Brad Gilbert | 2–6, 2–6 | 6–4, 7–6 | 4–6, 6–4, 6–4 | 2–1 | 4–3 | 33–36 | 2 | |
4 | Jimmy Connors | 3–4, r | 4–6, 6–7 | 5–7, 6–2, 3–6 | 0–3 | 1–4 | 27–32 | 4 | |
5 | Boris Becker | 4–6, 7–6, 3–6 | 6–4, 4–6, 4–6 | 7–5, 2–6, 6–3 | 1–2 | 4–5 | 43–48 | 3 |
Standings are determined by: 1. number of wins; 2. number of matches; 3. in two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4. in three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5. steering-committee decision.
Edberg | Cash | Mečíř | Wilander | RR W–L |
Set W–L |
Game W–L |
Standings | ||
2 | Stefan Edberg | 6–4, 4–6, 6–1 | 6–3, 6–3 | 6–2, 7–6 | 3–0 | 6–1 | 41–25 | 1 | |
7 | Pat Cash | 4–6, 6–4, 1–6 | 7–5, 6–4 | 6–7, 3–6 | 1–2 | 3–4 | 33–38 | 3 | |
6 | Miloslav Mečíř | 3–6, 3–6 | 5–7, 4–6 | 4–6, 1–6 | 0–3 | 0–6 | 20–37 | 4 | |
3 | Mats Wilander | 2–6, 6–7 | 7–6, 6–3 | 6–4, 6–1 | 2–1 | 4–2 | 33–27 | 2 |
Standings are determined by: 1. number of wins; 2. number of matches; 3. in two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4. in three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5. steering-committee decision.