In today's world, 1991 ATP Tour World Championships – Singles has become increasingly important in different areas of society. Both in the work and personal world, 1991 ATP Tour World Championships – Singles has generated a significant impact, generating changes and transformations in the way we interact with our environment. Since its emergence, 1991 ATP Tour World Championships – Singles has marked a before and after in the way we address different problems and challenges, becoming an essential element in the daily lives of millions of people around the world. In this article, we will explore the fundamental role that 1991 ATP Tour World Championships – Singles plays in our lives, analyzing its influence on everyday aspects and society in general.
This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (July 2023) |
Singles | |
---|---|
1991 ATP Tour World Championships | |
Champion | Pete Sampras |
Runner-up | Jim Courier |
Score | 3–6, 7–6(7–5), 6–3, 6–4 |
Draw | 8 |
Pete Sampras defeated Jim Courier in the final, 3–6, 7–6(7–5), 6–3, 6–4 to win the singles title at the 1991 ATP Tour World Championships. It was his first Tour Finals title.
Andre Agassi was the defending champion, but was defeated by Courier in the semifinals.
Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||
4 | Ivan Lendl | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||
6 | Pete Sampras | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||
6 | Pete Sampras | 3 | 7 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||
1 | Jim Courier | 6 | 65 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||
7 | Andre Agassi | 3 | 5 | ||||||||||||
1 | Jim Courier | 6 | 7 |
Courier | Lendl | Forget | Nováček | RR W–L |
Set W–L |
Game W–L |
Standings | ||
1 | Jim Courier | 2–6, 3–6 | 7–6(7–4), 6–4 | 6–7(6–8), 7–6(7–5), 6–4 | 2–1 | 4–3 | 37–39 | 2 | |
4 | Ivan Lendl | 6–2, 6–3 | 6–2, 6–4 | 6–2, 6–2 | 3–0 | 6–0 | 36–15 | 1 | |
5 | Guy Forget | 6–7(4–7), 4–6 | 2–6, 4–6 | 6–3, 7–6(7–3) | 1–2 | 2–4 | 29–34 | 3 | |
8 | Karel Nováček | 7–6(8–6), 6–7(5–7), 4–6 | 2–6, 2–6 | 3–6, 6–7(3–7) | 0–3 | 1–6 | 30–44 | 4 |
Standings are determined by: 1. number of wins; 2. number of matches; 3. in two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4. in three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5. steering-committee decision.
Becker | Stich | Sampras | Agassi | RR W–L |
Set W–L |
Game W–L |
Standings | ||
2 | Boris Becker | 7–6(7–1), 6–3 | 6–4, 6–7(3–7), 6–1 | 3–6, 5–7 | 2–1 | 4–3 | 39–34 | 3 | |
3 | Michael Stich | 6–7(1–7), 3–6 | 2–6, 6–7(3–7) | 5–7, 3–6 | 0–3 | 0–6 | 25–39 | 4 | |
6 | Pete Sampras | 4–6, 7–6(7–3), 1–6 | 6–2, 7–6(7–3) | 6–3, 1–6, 6–3 | 2–1 | 5–3 | 38–38 | 2 | |
7 | Andre Agassi | 6–3, 7–5 | 7–5, 6–3 | 3–6, 6–1, 3–6 | 2–1 | 5–2 | 38–29 | 1 |
Standings are determined by: 1. number of wins; 2. number of matches; 3. in two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4. in three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5. steering-committee decision.