1995 ATP Tour World Championships – Singles is a topic that has captured the attention of many people in recent times. With its relevance and topicality, it has become a topic of general interest for a wide range of audiences. From its impact on society to its implications in various areas, 1995 ATP Tour World Championships – Singles has generated debate and reflection in different sectors. In this article, we will explore the different facets of 1995 ATP Tour World Championships – Singles and its influence on our daily reality.
Singles | |
---|---|
1995 ATP Tour World Championships | |
Champion | Boris Becker |
Runner-up | Michael Chang |
Score | 7–6(7–3), 6–0, 7–6(7–5) |
Draw | 8 |
Boris Becker defeated Michael Chang in the final, 7–6(7–3), 6–0, 7–6(7–5) to win the singles tennis title at the 1995 ATP Tour World Championships.
Pete Sampras was the defending champion, but was defeated in the semifinals by Chang.
Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||
1 | Pete Sampras | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||
3 | Michael Chang | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||
3 | Michael Chang | 63 | 0 | 65 | |||||||||||
4 | Boris Becker | 77 | 6 | 77 | |||||||||||
7 | Thomas Enqvist | 4 | 77 | 5 | |||||||||||
4 | Boris Becker | 6 | 65 | 7 |
Sampras | Becker | Kafelnikov | Ferreira | RR W–L |
Set W–L |
Game W–L |
Standings | ||
1 | Pete Sampras | 6–2, 7–6(7–3) | 6–3, 6–3 | 6–7(1–7), 6–4, 3–6 | 2–1 | 5–2 | 40–31 | 1 | |
4 | Boris Becker | 2–6, 6–7(3–7) | 6–4, 7–5 | 4–6, 6–2, 7–6(7–5) | 2–1 | 4–3 | 38–36 | 2 | |
5 | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 3–6, 3–6 | 4–6, 5–7 | 6–3, 6–7(5–7), 1–6 | 0–3 | 1–6 | 28–41 | 4 | |
8 | Wayne Ferreira | 7–6(7–1), 4–6, 6–3 | 6–4, 2–6, 6–7(5–7) | 3–6, 7–6(7–5), 6–1 | 2–1 | 5–4 | 47–45 | 3 |
Standings are determined by: 1. number of wins; 2. number of matches; 3. in two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4. in three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5. steering-committee decision.
Muster | Chang | Courier | Enqvist | RR W–L |
Set W–L |
Game W–L |
Standings | ||
2 | Thomas Muster | 6–4, 2–6, 3–6 | 4–6, 6–4, 4–6 | 4–6, 7–6(7–3), 4–6 | 0–3 | 3–6 | 40–50 | 4 | |
3 | Michael Chang | 4–6, 6–2, 6–3 | 6–2, 7–5 | 1–6, 4–6 | 2–1 | 4–3 | 34–30 | 2 | |
6 | Jim Courier | 6–4, 4–6, 6–4 | 2–6, 5–7 | 3–6, 2–6 | 1–2 | 2–5 | 28–39 | 3 | |
7 | Thomas Enqvist | 6–4, 6–7(3–7), 6–4 | 6–1, 6–4 | 6–3, 6–2 | 3–0 | 6–1 | 42–25 | 1 |
Standings are determined by: 1. number of wins; 2. number of matches; 3. in two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4. in three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5. steering-committee decision.