This article will address the topic of 2004 Kentucky Amendment 1, which has been of great interest and relevance in various contexts throughout history. Since its origins, 2004 Kentucky Amendment 1 has sparked curiosity and debate among experts and fans, generating endless theories, studies and research that seek to fully understand its meaning and impact on society. Over the years, 2004 Kentucky Amendment 1 has played a fundamental role in different fields, from culture and art, to science and technology, leaving an indelible mark on humanity. In this sense, it is essential to analyze and reflect on 2004 Kentucky Amendment 1, its multiple facets and its influence on the contemporary world.
This article needs additional citations for verification. (October 2023) |
November 2, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Are you in favor of amending the Kentucky Constitution to provide that only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be a marriage in Kentucky, and that a legal status identical to or similar to marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized? | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
County results
Yes 90–100% 80–90% 70–80% 60–70% 50–60%
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Source: [1][2] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Elections in Kentucky |
|---|
|
|
Kentucky Constitutional Amendment 1[3] of 2004, is an amendment to the Kentucky Constitution that made it unconstitutional for the state to recognize or perform same-sex marriages or civil unions. The referendum was approved by 75% of the voters.[4]
The text of the amendment states:
Only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in Kentucky. A legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized.[5]
Amendments to the Kentucky Constitution require 3/5 support in both houses of the General Assembly and a majority vote by referendum; they can not be vetoed by the governor. The amendment was first introduced in the 2004 Kentucky General Assembly as Senate Bill 245. The bill subsequently passed both houses.
The bill was initially passed by the senate on March 11 by a 33–4 vote.

The bill was approved by the house, with an amendment, on April 12 by a 85–11 vote.
| Party | Votes for | Votes against | Not voting | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic (64) | 51 | 3 | ||
| Republican (36) | 34 | 1 | ||
| Total (100) | 85 | 11 | 4 | |

The bill was approved by the senate again, with the house amendment, on April 13 by a 33–5 vote.
| Party | Votes for | Votes against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic (16) | 12 | ||
| Republican (22) | 21 | ||
| Total (38) | 33 | 5 | |
On September 10, 2013, the Kentucky Equality Federation sued the Commonwealth of Kentucky in Franklin Circuit Court claiming Kentucky's 2004 Constitutional Amendment banning same-sex marriage violated sections of the commonwealth's constitution. Case # 13-CI-1074 was assigned by the Franklin County Court Clerk (the location of the Kentucky State Capitol). The lawsuit was conceived by President Jordan Palmer, written and signed by Vice President of Legal Jillian Hall, Esq. On April 16, 2015, the case was decided in favor of the plaintiff by Franklin County Circuit Court Judge Thomas D. Wingate.
This provision also became void in 2015 when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
| Choice | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|
| 1,222,125 | 74.55 | |
| No | 417,097 | 25.45 |
| Total votes | 1,639,222 | 100.00 |
| Registered voters/turnout | 3,057,741 | 53.6 |