2009 California Proposition 1B
In today's world, 2009 California Proposition 1B has become a topic of great relevance and interest to a wide spectrum of society. Whether due to its impact on the economy, politics, technology or culture, 2009 California Proposition 1B has positioned itself as a key point in the discussion and analysis of various aspects of modern life. Since its inception, 2009 California Proposition 1B has sparked curiosity and debate, generating conflicting opinions and encouraging the search for solutions and innovations. Throughout history, 2009 California Proposition 1B has been the protagonist of countless significant events, marking a before and after in the way in which various topics are conceived and addressed. In this article, we will explore the different dimensions and facets of 2009 California Proposition 1B, analyzing its importance and implications in the contemporary world.
| Elections in California |
|---|
 |
Proposition 1B was a defeated California ballot proposition that appeared on the May 19, 2009 special election ballot. The measure was legislatively referred to the ballot by the State Legislature. If passed it would have secured additional funding for primary education. Additionally, Proposition 1B would have only passed if Proposition 1A passed as well.
Background
In February 2009 the State Legislature narrowly passed the 2008–2009 state budget during a special session, months after it was due. As part of the plan to lower the state's annual deficits, the State Legislature ordered a special election with various budget reform ballot propositions, among them Proposition 1B.[1]
The proposition was part of Assembly Constitutional Amendment 2 (Third Extraordinary Session), which was authored by Speaker of the State Assembly Karen Bass, a Democrat from Los Angeles.[2] The amendment passed in the State Assembly by a vote of 68 to 11 and in the State Senate by a vote of 28 to 10.[2]
Proposal
Proposition 1B would have mandated supplemental payments of $9.3 billion to schools and community colleges. This figure was the difference between the amount actually appropriated in recent budgets, and the amount that, under some interpretations of Proposition 98, should have been spent. If approved by a popular vote majority, the measure would only have been enacted if Proposition 1A had also been approved.[1]
Results
| Choice | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|
 No
|
2,975,560 | 61.86 |
| Yes | 1,834,242 | 38.14 |
| Valid votes | 4,809,802 | 98.72 |
| Invalid or blank votes | 62,143 | 1.28 |
| Total votes | 4,871,945 | 100.00 |
| Registered voters/turnout | 17,153,012 | 28.40 |
References
- ^ a b "Proposition 1A Analysis - Voter Information Guide 2009". California Secretary of State. Archived from the original on May 7, 2009. Retrieved 2009-05-08.
- ^ a b "Bill Documents: ACAX3 2". California Office of the Legislative Counsel. Retrieved 2009-07-14.
- ^ "Statement of Vote: May 19, 2009, Statewide Special Election" (PDF). California Secretary of State. 2009-06-26. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-07-16. Retrieved 2009-06-26.