In this article we will delve into the fascinating world of ADF-GLS test, exploring its many facets and its impact on today's society. From its origins to its relevance today, we will analyze in detail every aspect of ADF-GLS test, offering a complete and specialized overview that gives the reader a comprehensive understanding of this topic. Through detailed research, data and analysis, we will discover how ADF-GLS test has influenced and transformed various aspects of everyday life, as well as its importance in contemporary culture. Focusing on its historical, social and cultural relevance, this article seeks to provide a broad and enriching overview that invites reflection and deep knowledge about ADF-GLS test.
In statistics and econometrics, the ADF-GLS test (or DF-GLS test) is a test for a unit root in an economic time series sample. It was developed by Elliott, Rothenberg and Stock (ERS) in 1992 as a modification of the augmented Dickey–Fuller test (ADF).[1]
A unit root test determines whether a time series variable is non-stationary using an autoregressive model. For series featuring deterministic components in the form of a constant or a linear trend then ERS developed an asymptotically point optimal test to detect a unit root. This testing procedure dominates other existing unit root tests in terms of power. It locally de-trends (de-means) data series to efficiently estimate the deterministic parameters of the series, and use the transformed data to perform a usual ADF unit root test. This procedure helps to remove the means and linear trends for series that are not far from the non-stationary region.[2]
Consider a simple time series model with where is the deterministic part and is the stochastic part of . When the true value of is close to 1, estimation of the model, i.e. will pose efficiency problems because the will be close to nonstationary. In this setting, testing for the stationarity features of the given times series will also be subject to general statistical problems. To overcome such problems ERS suggested to locally difference the time series.
Consider the case where closeness to 1 for the autoregressive parameter is modelled as where is the number of observations. Now consider filtering the series using with being a standard lag operator, i.e. . Working with would result in power gain, as ERS show, when testing the stationarity features of using the augmented Dickey-Fuller test. This is a point optimal test for which is set in such a way that the test would have a 50 percent power when the alternative is characterized by for . Depending on the specification of , will take different values.