In this article, we will delve into the topic of Academic Free License, which has aroused great interest and debate in different areas. Academic Free License is a topic that has become the focus of attention of experts, academics and specialists in the field, due to its relevance and impact in different sectors. Over the last decades, Academic Free License has been acquiring greater importance and relevance, generating endless questions and concerns about its influence on today's society. In this article, we will analyze in detail and exhaustively the different facets of Academic Free License, with the aim of providing a complete and well-founded overview of this topic.
Author | Lawrence E. Rosen |
---|---|
Latest version | 1.2, 2.1, 3.0 |
Publisher | Lawrence E. Rosen |
Published | 2002 |
SPDX identifier | AFL-3.0 AFL-2.1 AFL-2.0 AFL-1.2 AFL-1.1 |
Debian FSG compatible | ? |
FSF approved | Yes |
OSI approved | Yes |
GPL compatible | No |
Copyleft | No |
Linking from code with a different licence | Yes |
Website | rosenlaw |
The Academic Free License (AFL) is a permissive free software license written in 2002 by Lawrence E. Rosen, a former general counsel of the Open Source Initiative (OSI).
The license grants similar rights to the BSD, MIT, UoI/NCSA and Apache licenses – licenses allowing the software to be made proprietary – but was written to correct perceived problems with those licenses, the AFL:
The Free Software Foundation consider all AFL versions up to and including 3.0 as incompatible with the GNU GPL. though Eric S. Raymond (a co-founder of the OSI) contends that AFL 3.0 is GPL compatible. In late 2002, an OSI working draft considered it a "best practice" license. In mid-2006, however, the OSI's License Proliferation Committee found it "redundant with more popular licenses", specifically version 2 of the Apache Software License.