In this article we are going to address the topic of American Motorcycle Ass'n v. Superior Court from a broad and detailed perspective. This topic has been the subject of debate and study in different areas, so it is relevant to analyze it from various disciplines and approaches. Throughout the article, we will explore different aspects related to American Motorcycle Ass'n v. Superior Court, including its impact on society, its evolution over time, and possible future implications. In addition, we will immerse ourselves in the different opinions and positions that exist around this topic, with the aim of offering a complete and balanced vision. Through this comprehensive approach, we seek to provide the reader with a deep and enriching understanding of American Motorcycle Ass'n v. Superior Court, thus enriching knowledge and reflection on this topic.
American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County | |
---|---|
Decided February 9,, 1978 | |
Full case name | American Motorcycle Association, Petitioner, v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Respondent; Viking Motorcycle Club et al., |
Citation(s) | 20 Cal. 3d 578, 578 P.2d 899, 146 Cal. Rptr. 182 |
Holding | |
The court issued a peremptory writ of mandate and directed the trial court to vacate its order | |
Court membership | |
Chief Justice | Mathew Tobriner |
Associate Justices | Rose Elizabeth Bird, Stanley Mosk, Frank K. Richardson, Wiley W. Manuel,Raymond L. Sullivan, William Patrick Clark Jr. |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Mathew Tobriner, joined by Mathew Tobriner, Rose Elizabeth Bird, Stanley Mosk, Frank K. Richardson |
Concurrence | Wiley W. Manuel,Raymond L. Sullivan |
Dissent | William Patrick Clark Jr. |
American Motorcycle Association v. Superior Court, 20 Cal. 3d 578 (1978), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of California that first adopted a comparative fault regime for apportionment of liability among multiple tortfeasors for negligence in California.