In this article, we are going to delve into the topic of Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification, exploring its different facets and relevant aspects. Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification is a broad and varied topic that has captured the interest and attention of many people around the world. Through analysis and reflection, we will try to shed light on different points of view and perspectives related to Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification, with the aim of providing a complete and enriching vision. Likewise, we will discuss the historical evolution of Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification, its relevance today and possible implications for the future. Join us on this exciting exploration of Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification and discover everything this theme has to offer!
This is a maintenance category, used for maintenance of the Wikipedia project. It is not part of the encyclopedia and contains non-article pages, or groups articles by status rather than subject. Do not include this category in content categories.
This is a hidden category. It is not shown on its member pages, unless the corresponding user preference (Appearance → Show hidden categories) is set. |
Administrators: Please do not delete this category as empty! This category may be empty occasionally or even most of the time. |
Please add articles to this category by using {{Verify source}}
or {{Nonspecific}}
.
Use the {{Verify source}} or {{Nonspecific}} tags to put articles into this category. {{Check}} is a redirect to {{Verify source}}. This category is a self-reference.
Pages in this category sorted by importance/pageviews (Takes a couple minutes to load due to the size of this list)
Why not work on a WP:Citation needed statement. There are 519,177 articles that have single sentences needing additional Verification. The tool Citation Hunt makes that easier by suggesting random articles, which you can sort by topical category membership.