Conversational scoreboard
In this article, we are going to delve into the topic of Conversational scoreboard and how it has impacted different areas of society. Since its emergence, Conversational scoreboard has captured the attention of experts and fans alike, generating debates and controversies around its implications. Over the years, Conversational scoreboard has evolved and adapted to the changes of the modern world, influencing everything from politics and economics to popular culture and entertainment. Through this analysis, we will explore various aspects related to Conversational scoreboard, to understand its importance and significance today.
In linguistics and philosophy of language, the conversational scoreboard is a tuple which represents the discourse context at a given point in a conversation. The scoreboard is updated by each speech act performed by one of the interlocutors.
Most theories of conversational scorekeeping take one of the scoreboard's elements to be a common ground, which represents the propositional information mutually agreed upon by the interlocutors. When an interlocutor makes a successful assertion, its content is added to the common ground. Once in the common ground, that information can then be presupposed by future utterances. Depending on the particular theory of scorekeeping, additional elements of the scoreboard may include a stack of questions under discussion, a list of discourse referents available for anaphora, among other categories of contextual information.
The notion of a conversational scoreboard was introduced by David Lewis in his most-cited paper Scorekeeping in a Language Game. In the paper, Lewis draws an analogy between conversation and baseball, where the scoreboard tracks categories of information such as strikes, outs, and runs, thereby defining the current state of the game and thereby determining which future moves are licit.
See also
Notes
- ^ a b Weatherson, Brian (2021). "David Lewis". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
- ^ Malamud, Sophia; Stephenson, Tamina (2015). "Three ways to avoid commitments: Declarative force modifiers in the conversational scoreboard". Journal of Semantics. 32 (2): 275–311. doi:10.1093/jos/ffu002.
- ^ a b Jeong, Sunwoo (2018). "Intonation and sentence type conventions: Two types of rising declaratives". Journal of Semantics. 35 (2): 305–356. doi:10.1093/semant/ffy001.
- ^ a b Green, Mitchell (2021). "Speech Acts". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
- ^ a b c Lewis, David (1979). "Scorekeeping in a Language Game". Journal of Philosophical Logic. 8. doi:10.1007/BF00258436. S2CID 206773185.
 | This semantics article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
| This pragmatics-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |