Crowd abuse
In today's world, Crowd abuse has become a topic of great relevance and interest to a wide range of people. From its origin to its impact on today's society, Crowd abuse has sparked debates and reflections in different areas, and its influence extends to various aspects of daily life. In this article, we will explore in detail the various aspects related to Crowd abuse, analyzing its historical, social, cultural and economic dimensions. Through a multidisciplinary approach, we will seek to understand the complexity and importance of Crowd abuse in the contemporary world, as well as its potential to generate significant changes in different spheres of society.
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (November 2012) |
Crowd abuse or barracking refers to the widespread practice of crowds following various sports to criticise or abuse opponents, by shouting, chanting, singing or through the use of banners in the stadium. Motivation for crowd abuse includes gaining a psychological advantage over an opponent, either individually or as a team. Examples of the effectiveness of such techniques can be found in any major sport, including some dangerous outcomes such as the Malice in the palace (Pacers-Pistons Brawl).
Malice at the Palace featured both physical and verbal crowd abuse, and contributed to many player's careers changing in the blink of an eye. Ron Artest was suspended for the rest of the season, stagnated on his basketball improvements, and was traded 16 games into the next season, ending the era of his Pacers team/dynasty. On December 8, 2004, five Pacers players and five fans were charged with assault and battery. All of the fans involved were banned from the Palace of Auburn Hills. Security at professional sports games changed drastically after the incident as well, with comments from players such as Jermaine O'Neal stating that "There was no security. You’re talking about one of the largest arenas in the NBA and you’re talking about...a large group in there that was literally trying to hurt us." Sekou Smith (NBA Writer, Indianapolis Star) stated "There was no security to keep people from jumping over that little rail and getting down to the floor." Due to the influence alcohol had on the situation, the NBA banned alcohol sales after the third quarter of any basketball game.
See also
References
- ^ "Chelsea angry at Grant barracking". BBC Sport. 30 September 2007. Retrieved 9 November 2012.
- ^ "How 'Malice at the Palace' changed 6 NBA careers". SBNation.com. Retrieved 2018-04-23.
- ^ Haddad, Ken. "10 years later: Remembering the 2004 Pistons-Pacers brawl". www.clickondetroit.com. Retrieved 2018-04-23.
- ^ a b Abrams, Jonathan (2012-03-20). "The Malice at the Palace". Grantland. Retrieved 2018-04-23.
- ^ "As 'Malice at the Palace' brawl turns 10, impact lasts". USA TODAY. Retrieved 2018-04-23.
 | This sports-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
 | This social psychology-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |