Nowadays, Cyberwar: How Russian Hackers and Trolls Helped Elect a President has become a topic of great interest and relevance in modern society. With the rapid advancement of technology and globalization, Cyberwar: How Russian Hackers and Trolls Helped Elect a President has acquired a fundamental role in different aspects of daily life. From its impact on the economy to its influence on culture and the environment, Cyberwar: How Russian Hackers and Trolls Helped Elect a President has generated an ongoing debate among experts and citizens. In this article, we will explore the different aspects related to Cyberwar: How Russian Hackers and Trolls Helped Elect a President, analyzing its importance and implications today.
Author | Kathleen Hall Jamieson |
---|---|
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Publication date | October 3, 2018 |
Pages | 336 |
ISBN | 978-0190915810 |
Trump–Russia relations |
---|
Cyberwar: How Russian Hackers and Trolls Helped Elect a President — What We Don't, Can't, and Do Know is the sixteenth book by Kathleen Hall Jamieson, published in October 2018 by Oxford University Press. The book concludes that Russia very likely delivered Trump's victory in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
Jamieson begins with five premises:
Two chapters deal with who did it, why, and why might it matter. Chapter 2 explains that past research indicates that messaging like the Russians' is enough to be able to alter the results of a close election. Then, in five chapters, Jamieson examines the question of whether or not the Russians did what was necessary to affect the election's outcome. Three chapters deal with how the hacked content affected the last month of the campaign. Finally, Jamieson explains what we know, and what we can't know about how effective the Russians were. Regarding what we can't know, Jamieson doesn't claim to be able to identify specific U.S. citizens who changed their votes as a result of Russian interference. There is a short afterword.
In a PBS Newshour interview about the book, the anchor asked Jamieson "Did Russia turn the outcome of the last presidential race?" Jamieson replied, "I believe it's highly probable that they did, not certain, but highly probable."
On the whole, reviews were positive. The Guardian offered the only notable criticism; the reviewer thought that Cyberwar was a special plead excusing Clinton's loss. The Guardian did, however, agree to publish an opinion piece by Hall Jamieson. Blurbs were offered by NBC's Andrea Mitchell, Judy Woodruff of PBS, and Robert Jervis of Columbia University. Jane Mayer wrote a feature for The New Yorker based on the book. The Washington Post reported on Jamieson's criticism of the news media. Nature called Jamieson's critique of the press and its readers the book's most important. Kirkus Reviews concludes, "There's no good news in this book, which both admonishes and forewarns."
An academic review published in Public Opinion Quarterly expressed concern that Jamieson's evidence was largely circumstantial, going so far as to call the book "336 pages of mere speculation."
The book won the 2019 R.R. Hawkins Award from the Association of American Publishers, and was a Book of the Year in The Times Literary Supplement.
{{cite book}}
: |work=
ignored (help)