In today's world, Differential technological development is a topic that has captured the attention of millions of people around the world. From its impact on society to its implications on the global economy, Differential technological development has been the subject of debate and controversy. With technological advances and changes in communities, Differential technological development has taken a leading role in people's daily lives. In this article, we will explore the various facets of Differential technological development, analyzing its influence on different aspects of society and examining possible implications for the future.
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
Differential technological development is a strategy of technology governance aiming to decrease risks from emerging technologies by influencing the sequence in which they are developed. On this strategy, societies would strive to delay the development of harmful technologies and their applications, while accelerating the development of beneficial technologies, especially those that offer protection against the harmful ones.
Differential technological development was initially proposed by philosopher Nick Bostrom in 2002 and he applied the idea to the governance of artificial intelligence in his 2014 book Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. The strategy was also endorsed by philosopher Toby Ord in his 2020 book The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity, who writes that "While it may be too difficult to prevent the development of a risky technology, we may be able to reduce existential risk by speeding up the development of protective technologies relative to dangerous ones."
Paul Christiano believes that while accelerating technological progress appears to be one of the best ways to improve human welfare in the next few decades, a faster rate of growth cannot be equally important for the far future because growth must eventually saturate due to physical limits. Hence, from the perspective of the far future, differential technological development appears more crucial.[unreliable source?]
Inspired by Bostrom's proposal, Luke Muehlhauser and Anna Salamon suggested a more general project of "differential intellectual progress", in which society advances its wisdom, philosophical sophistication, and understanding of risks faster than its technological power.[unreliable source?][unreliable source?] Brian Tomasik has expanded on this notion.[unreliable source?]
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires |journal=
(help) 9 Journal of Evolution and Technology Jetpress Oxford Research Archive
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires |journal=
(help)