In today's world, Divisibility (ring theory) has become a topic of great importance and interest to a wide range of people. Whether it is a concept, a prominent figure, a historical event or a current topic, Divisibility (ring theory) has managed to capture attention and generate debate in multiple spheres of society. Its impact has been present in different areas, from politics and economics, to culture and entertainment. As Divisibility (ring theory) continues to be high on the global agenda, it is crucial to delve deeper into its context, implications and relevance in the contemporary world. In this article, we will thoroughly explore the phenomenon of Divisibility (ring theory) and its various implications, offering a comprehensive and objective vision of this topic of great relevance today.
In mathematics, the notion of a divisor originally arose within the context of arithmetic of whole numbers. With the development of abstract rings, of which the integers are the archetype, the original notion of divisor found a natural extension.
Divisibility is a useful concept for the analysis of the structure of commutative rings because of its relationship with the ideal structure of such rings.
Let R be a ring,[a] and let a and b be elements of R. If there exists an element x in R with ax = b, one says that a is a left divisor of b and that b is a right multiple of a.[1] Similarly, if there exists an element y in R with ya = b, one says that a is a right divisor of b and that b is a left multiple of a. One says that a is a two-sided divisor of b if it is both a left divisor and a right divisor of b; the x and y above are not required to be equal.
When R is commutative, the notions of left divisor, right divisor, and two-sided divisor coincide, so one says simply that a is a divisor of b, or that b is a multiple of a, and one writes . Elements a and b of an integral domain are associates if both and . The associate relationship is an equivalence relation on R, so it divides R into disjoint equivalence classes.
Note: Although these definitions make sense in any magma, they are used primarily when this magma is the multiplicative monoid of a ring.
Statements about divisibility in a commutative ring can be translated into statements about principal ideals. For instance,
In the above, denotes the principal ideal of generated by the element .
This article incorporates material from the Citizendium article "Divisibility (ring theory)", which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License but not under the GFDL.