Tu banner alternativo

Divisibility (ring theory)

In today's world, Divisibility (ring theory) has become a topic of great importance and interest to a wide range of people. Whether it is a concept, a prominent figure, a historical event or a current topic, Divisibility (ring theory) has managed to capture attention and generate debate in multiple spheres of society. Its impact has been present in different areas, from politics and economics, to culture and entertainment. As Divisibility (ring theory) continues to be high on the global agenda, it is crucial to delve deeper into its context, implications and relevance in the contemporary world. In this article, we will thoroughly explore the phenomenon of Divisibility (ring theory) and its various implications, offering a comprehensive and objective vision of this topic of great relevance today.

Tu banner alternativo

In mathematics, the notion of a divisor originally arose within the context of arithmetic of whole numbers. With the development of abstract rings, of which the integers are the archetype, the original notion of divisor found a natural extension.

Divisibility is a useful concept for the analysis of the structure of commutative rings because of its relationship with the ideal structure of such rings.

Definition

Let R be a ring,[a] and let a and b be elements of R. If there exists an element x in R with ax = b, one says that a is a left divisor of b and that b is a right multiple of a.[1] Similarly, if there exists an element y in R with ya = b, one says that a is a right divisor of b and that b is a left multiple of a. One says that a is a two-sided divisor of b if it is both a left divisor and a right divisor of b; the x and y above are not required to be equal.

When R is commutative, the notions of left divisor, right divisor, and two-sided divisor coincide, so one says simply that a is a divisor of b, or that b is a multiple of a, and one writes . Elements a and b of an integral domain are associates if both and . The associate relationship is an equivalence relation on R, so it divides R into disjoint equivalence classes.

Note: Although these definitions make sense in any magma, they are used primarily when this magma is the multiplicative monoid of a ring.

Properties

Statements about divisibility in a commutative ring can be translated into statements about principal ideals. For instance,

  • One has if and only if .
  • Elements a and b are associates if and only if .
  • An element u is a unit if and only if u is a divisor of every element of R.
  • An element u is a unit if and only if .
  • If for some unit u, then a and b are associates. If R is an integral domain, then the converse is true.
  • Let R be an integral domain. If the elements in R are totally ordered by divisibility, then R is called a valuation ring.

In the above, denotes the principal ideal of generated by the element .

Zero as a divisor, and zero divisors

  • If one interprets the definition of divisor literally, every a is a divisor of 0, since one can take x = 0. Because of this, it is traditional to abuse terminology by making an exception for zero divisors: one calls an element a in a commutative ring a zero divisor if there exists a nonzero x such that ax = 0.[2]
  • Some texts apply the term 'zero divisor' to a nonzero element x where the multiplier a is additionally required to be nonzero where x solves the expression ax = 0, but such a definition is both more complicated and lacks some of the above properties.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ In this article, rings are assumed to have a 1.

Citations

  1. ^ Bourbaki 1989, p. 97
  2. ^ Bourbaki 1989, p. 98

References

  • Bourbaki, N. (1989) , Algebra I, Chapters 1–3, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 9783540642435

This article incorporates material from the Citizendium article "Divisibility (ring theory)", which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License but not under the GFDL.