In this article, we will explore various aspects related to Doctrine of the two swords, with the aim of delving into its meaning, importance and relevance in different areas. From its impact on today's society to its influence in specific areas, Doctrine of the two swords has captured the attention of experts and scholars from different disciplines. Through a detailed and multifaceted analysis, different perspectives will be presented that will allow readers to fully understand the importance of Doctrine of the two swords and its impact on the contemporary world. This article seeks to provide a comprehensive and enriching vision of Doctrine of the two swords, providing relevant and updated information that contributes to the knowledge and understanding of this topic.
You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding articles in Spanish, German and French. (May 2024) Click for important translation instructions.
|

| Part of a series on |
| Integralism |
|---|
In Catholicism, the doctrine (or theory) of the two swords is an exegesis of Luke 22:38 elaborated in the Middle Ages. It can be understood as a particular justification for the Gelasian doctrine of "the sacred authority of the priesthood and the royal power".[1]
This particular exegesis of "here are two swords ... it is enough" was first put forward by Peter Damian in the 1060s. It was later taken up by Gottschalk of Aachen on behalf of the Emperor Henry IV (1056–1105) against the claims of Pope Gregory VII (1073–1085) during the Investiture Contest. In the 12th century, Bernard of Clairvaux, in his De consideratione, argued that both the "material sword" (gladius materialis) and the "spiritual sword" (gladius spiritualis) belonged ultimately to the Papacy.[1]
By the early 13th century, the two swords were the subject of serious study and debate among canon lawyers and decretalists. The main question was whether Bernard was right. Had God given each sword to its rightful bearer, the Holy Roman Emperor and the Pope, or had he given both to the Pope, who then bestowed the material sword on the emperor? When Pope Gregory IX started the War of the Keys against Emperor Frederick II in 1228, it was on the basis of a claim to control both swords. In any case, however, churchmen could not bear actual swords; the material swords was to be wielded by laymen, even if under papal authority.[2]