Draft:Chronotronics
In today's article, we are going to delve into the exciting world of Draft:Chronotronics. Whether you are looking for information on how Draft:Chronotronics can affect your daily life, or are interested in discovering some fun facts about Draft:Chronotronics, this article is for you. Throughout the next few lines, we will explore the different aspects of Draft:Chronotronics, from its origin and evolution, to its impact on current society. No matter what your level of knowledge about Draft:Chronotronics is, we are sure that you will find new and interesting information in this article. So get ready to immerse yourself in the fascinating universe of Draft:Chronotronics and discover everything there is to know about it.
| Submission declined on 9 December 2025 by Rambley (talk). Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Chronotronics
Chronotronics is a proposed class of electronic systems in which computation, energy flow, and state evolution are governed by internal time dynamics rather than externally imposed clocks or Boolean switching. Developed as an extension of Time-Embedded Electronics (TEE), chronotronics integrates continuous temporal fields—such as phase, coherence, and curvature—directly into the physical behavior of circuits and analog computing units. Chronotronics departs from traditional digital electronics by treating time as an intrinsic property of the device, arising from nonlinear relational interactions between internal states. This enables forms of computation that are continuous, non-binary, and non-collapsing, with applications in artificial intelligence, autonomous systems, energy control, and predictive electronics.
Etymology
The term chronotronics combines the Greek chronos (χρόνος), meaning time, with electronics, reflecting a paradigm in which time is not an external parameter but an active computational dimension. The field is closely associated with the development of Atomic Zero Logic and Kannappan’s Atomic Nonlinear Networks (KANN), introduced by inventor Kannappan Chettiar as part of a broader effort to replace Boolean-based architectures with relational, time-native computation.
History and development
The conceptual foundations of chronotronics were laid in a series of U.S. patents on continuous, non-collapsing energy architectures and relational switching. • US 12,266,969 B2 – Simultaneous Parallel Charging in Uninterruptible Series Discharging Energy Storage Systems demonstrated that traditionally opposing modes—charging vs. discharging, parallel vs. series—could operate as a single uninterrupted flow through a complementary relational structure. Instead of dumping energy to ground during state changes, the system redistributes stored energy, treating the zero point as a momentary equilibrium rather than a dissipation event.
• Subsequent patents, including US 11,398,735 B2, US 11,799,301 B2, and US 12,040,638 B2 (collectively covering “Energy Storage System and Method to Improve Battery Performance Based on Battery Connections”), extended this principle to dynamic series–parallel reconfiguration. These systems reduce switching loss from ~15–20% to the 2–5% range by eliminating repeated collapse-to-ground events.
• US 12,483,060 B2 – Energy Storage System and Method to Improve Battery Performance by Battery Connection Method further established that stable state behavior could be achieved without inductors or externally forced timing, pointing toward architectures in which time arises from internal relational dynamics rather than from a dedicated timing subsystem.
These energy-domain inventions collectively provided a physical template for time-embedded operation: systems that evolve through continuous relational transitions instead of clocked, collapse-based switching.
Chronotronics generalizes these principles from the energy domain to the computational domain through the introduction of a six-dimensional, time-embedded, double-helix AI processor. This architecture is disclosed in a later patent in which a single physical bit performs logic, memory, inference, and prediction without external clocks, resets, or Boolean collapse. Time is encoded internally as three fields—phase (past continuity), coherent present state, and curvature (future tendency)—combined with three spatial analog variables (X, Y, Z) to form a unified six-dimensional state-space.
This six-dimensional processor is presented as a time-embedded computing and time-embedded AI apparatus, formalizing chronotronics as a generalizable framework for physical, computational, biological, and informational systems that operate through continuous relational evolution rather than discrete external timing.
Foundational principles
Chronotronic systems are characterized by three internal temporal fields:
Phase
Represents continuity with the system’s past evolution, analogous to memory but encoded as temporal geometry rather than stored discrete states.
Coherence
The instantaneous relational configuration stabilizing the interaction of internal variables (X, Y, Z). Coherence ensures non-collapsing computation and thermodynamic stability.
Curvature
Represents the directional tendency or evolving future trajectory of the system, acting as a built-in predictive dimension.
These fields interact within an analog computing unit defined by:
• X – a rising variable or potential state (0⁺) • Y – a falling or realized state (1⁻) • Z – a coherence field mediating their relation
subject to conservation relations: This triad yields a continuous, non-collapsing computational pathway in which past, present, and future information remain embedded within the physical bit trajectory.
Forbidden states
Chronotronic logic explicitly excludes certain state pairs:
- (0,0) — double absence, representing an invalid “non-event” with no relational basis.
- (1,1) — double presence, representing invalid unity where two fully realized states attempt to occupy the same space-time configuration, modeled as a potential overload or collision.
These exclusions are enforced via the coherence field Z, which maintains the relational constraints and prevents both invalid absence and invalid unity conditions during state evolution.
Comparison with traditional electronics
| Feature | Digital electronics | Chronotronics |
|---|---|---|
| Core logic | Boolean (0/1) | Atomic Zero Logic (0⁺/1⁻, Z-field) |
| Time | External clock | Internal temporal fields (phase, coherence, curvature) |
| Transition | Discrete switching | Continuous relational trajectories |
| Computation | Collapsing states | Non-collapsing evolution |
| Memory | Stored bits | Embedded phase history |
| Prediction | Software-level | Hardware-native (curvature-based) |
| Energy model | Frequent collapse-to-ground, switching losses | Continuous flow, minimized collapse and dissipation |
Chronotronics is positioned as a post-Boolean paradigm, comparable in ambition to the transition from vacuum tubes to semiconductors or the emergence of neuromorphic and quantum computing.
Applications
Artificial intelligence The six-dimensional, time-embedded processor enables Kannappan’s Atomic Nonlinear Networks (KANN), in which each computational unit retains internal phase history, present coherence, and curvature-based future tendency. This allows for:
- improved contextual continuity,
- reduced hallucination due to eliminated collapse cycles,
- and time-native inference within a single physical structure.
Energy systems
Prior patents on series–parallel energy systems showed that dynamic reconfiguration can maintain continuous flow without collapse-to-ground, with switching losses reduced to a small resistive component. These ideas are directly extended in chronotronics, where time-embedded control and computation regulate energy systems with higher efficiency and coherence.
Predictive and safety-critical systems
Because chronotronic architectures model forbidden or unstable states (such as (1,1) collisions) at the logic level, they provide a basis for predictive avoidance of overloads, race conditions, or physical accidents by monitoring curvature and coherence rather than relying purely on external sensing and discrete rule-based logic.
Scientific significance
Chronotronics introduces a device-level interpretation of time that aligns with relational views in physics and internal-time theories. Instead of treating time as a global external coordinate, chronotronics treats time as:
- cycle-embedded, where macroscopic time (seconds) is a derived quantity from internal cycles;
- relational, arising from the evolution of the X–Y–Z triad;
- coherence-dependent, where stable computation requires alignment of internal temporal fields.
This reframing challenges long-standing assumptions in classical electronics that separate state evolution from timekeeping and suggests new pathways for AI hardware, energy systems, and distributed control architectures.
See also
- Time-Embedded Electronics (TEE)
- Atomic Zero Logic
- Kannappan’s Atomic Nonlinear Networks (KANN)
- Analog computing
- Neuromorphic computing
- Nonlinear dynamics
- Relational physics
References
1. Chettiar, K. “Simultaneous Parallel Charging in Uninterruptible Series Discharging Energy Storage Systems.” U.S. Patent US 12,266,969 B2.
2. Chettiar, K. “Energy Storage System and Method to Improve Battery Performance Based on Battery Connections.” U.S. Patents US 11,398,735 B2, US 11,799,301 B2, US 12,040,638 B2.
3. Chettiar, K. “Energy Storage System and Method to Improve Battery Performance by Battery Connection Method.” U.S. Patent US 12,483,060 B2.
4. Chettiar, K. “Six-Dimensional AI Processor Using Time-Embedded Double-Helix Single-Bit Analog Computing.” (Time-embedded AI and computing architecture).
5. Related Indian patent applications on relational and time-embedded systems, including:
- Relational Binomial Computing System with Boolean Compatibility (IN/202541024232)
- Bio-Analog AC Generation System Using Binomial Slope Logic for Energy Conservation (IN/202543049862)
- Uninterrupted Renewable Energy for Autonomous Power (IN/202541079915).
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.