Draft:Digital Tools in African Migrant Tracking and Repatriation

This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Wikipedia article. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs · Article logs · Draft logs. Last edited by Auric (talk | contribs) 5 months ago. (Update) Finished drafting? Submit for review or Publish now

This article may incorporate text from a large language model. It may include hallucinated information, copyright violations, claims not verified in cited sources, original research, or fictitious references. Any such material should be removed, and content with an unencyclopedic tone should be rewritten. (July 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Governments and international organizations increasingly use digital technologies—such as biometric databases, mobile apps, drones, and data analytics—to monitor African migrants, facilitate repatriation, and support reintegration programs.^[1][2]

Under initiatives like the EU-IOM Integrated Border Management program, African countries such as Senegal have installed biometric fingerprinting and facial-recognition systems at entry and exit points to track migrants, creating cross-border surveillance networks linked with Interpol and Europol.^[1]

Civil rights advocates warn these tools disproportionately aid deportations and can be misused by national authorities to target activists and dissidents.^[1][2]

The IOM’s Return Case Management System (RCMS) uses digital platforms to streamline migrant profiling, document processing, and repatriation tracking. Its expansion aligns with rising deportation efforts from countries including Libya, the U.S., and several EU nations.^[2]

Human Rights Watch and academic analysts note that while the IOM claims RCMS supports voluntary return, the use of detention and coercion in some cases challenges this narrative.^[2][3]

Projects such as “Migrants as Messengers,” led by the IOM and ITU, employ smartphone apps and community-driven reporting. Returning migrants record testimonies of their journeys in countries like Nigeria, Senegal, and Guinea, then share via social media to educate prospective migrants about risks and realities.^[4]

These initiatives have amassed over 2 million video views and trained returnees as digital peer educators—though they primarily emphasize awareness rather than supporting formal repatriation processes.^[4]

Some digital tools integrate feedback loops from migrants, enabling human-rights monitoring and reinforcing messaging around assistance and post-return support.^[4]

Nonetheless, critics argue that such platforms often overlook the needs of undocumented migrants who fear digital data being used against them regarding arrest or deportation.^[5]

Supporters argue digital tracking accelerates return processing, improves data accuracy, and ensures migrant safety through real-time coordination. Detractors counter that surveillance technologies can erode trust, violate privacy, and facilitate authoritarian uses of migrant data.^[1][2]

Policymakers and NGOs propose integrating digital identity systems with robust data protections and local oversight—striving for transparent, rights-based deployment aligned with African digital sovereignty ambitions.^[6]

However, questions remain about ensuring accountability, consent, and equitable access—especially for irregular migrants lacking formal identification or fearing punitive outcomes.^[5][6]