In this article, we will explore the topic of Draft:Intrinsic Exchange Group in depth, analyzing its many facets and its impact on different aspects of daily life. From its origins to its relevance today, we will immerse ourselves in a journey through the history, advances, challenges and opportunities that Draft:Intrinsic Exchange Group presents in society. Through different perspectives, we will address its influence on culture, the economy, technology and interpersonal relationships, with the aim of fully understanding its importance and the implications it entails. Likewise, we will examine the different points of view and opinions of experts in the field, in order to offer a broad and complete vision about Draft:Intrinsic Exchange Group. Join us on this exciting journey to discover everything Draft:Intrinsic Exchange Group has to offer!
Submission declined on 13 July 2025 by Gheus (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Intrinsic Exchange Group (IEG) is a finance company founded in 2017. The company aims to integrate ecosystem valuation into the financial system to address environmental challenges through market-based approaches.[1][2]
IEG was founded by Douglas Eger with the objective of developing financial instruments to assign market value to natural assets. The company's main focus is Natural Asset Companies (NACs), which are designed to hold rights to ecosystem services and allow investors to trade shares, similar to a stock exchange. The development of NACs received early financial backing from The Rockefeller Foundation provided IEG with $1.7 million to fund research as well as the creation of an "ecological performance report" framework for valuing natural assets.[3][4]
Starting in 2021, IEG collaborated with the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) to file an application with the Securities and Exchange Commission to publicly list NACs.[2][5] However, in January 2024, the NYSE withdrew the proposal following significant political and public opposition.
IEG has been developing the NAC model since its founding in 2017.[2] The model is designed to assign financial value to ecosystems by allowing investors to buy shares in companies managing natural resources. NACs are intended to provide landowners with economic incentives for conservation and maintaining ecological integrity on their land.[4] After the NYSE NAC withdrawal in early 2024 IEG shifted its focus to private markets. Current projects include a 1.6 million-acre tribal land conservation project and a sustainability program focused on soybean farming, while an earlier pilot project in Costa Rica stalled due to political changes.[2][6]
IEG's NAC model has been met with opposition from conservative groups and Republican politicians, who have characterized it as a potential means of restricting land use or as an attempt by global entities to exert control over private land.[1][7] In response, 25 Republican attorneys general formally opposed the SEC proposal, raising concerns about its implications for land ownership and regulatory oversight.[8]
IEG has continued to develop NACs within private markets and maintains that participation in the model is voluntary and compliant with existing legal frameworks.[3] Eger has criticized opposition to the initiative, arguing that many critics have formed conclusions without seeking clarification from IEG directly.[3]
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.