In this article, we will explore Draft:Lounge in depth, addressing different aspects related to this topic. We will analyze its impact on society, its relevance today and its evolution over time. Likewise, we will examine the various opinions and perspectives that exist around Draft:Lounge, offering a comprehensive and balanced vision. Through a multidisciplinary approach, historical, sociological, economic and cultural aspects will be addressed, with the aim of providing the reader with a complete and enriching understanding of Draft:Lounge. In addition, case studies, testimonies and relevant data will be presented that will contribute to enrich this exploration. Don't miss this complete investigation on Draft:Lounge!
Submission declined on 23 June 2025 by CoconutOctopus (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
| Submission declined on 23 June 2025 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by KylieTastic 5 months ago.
|
| Submission declined on 23 June 2025 by Rambley (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Rambley 5 months ago.
|
| Company type | Private |
|---|---|
| Industry | EdTech, Student Engagement, Campus Management |
| Founded | 2020 |
| Founder | Jack Symonds |
| Headquarters | New York City , United States |
Key people | Jack Symonds (CEO), Eleanora Shantsila (CTO) Dominic Konstam (Head of Partnerships) |
| Products | Lounge app (campus engagement and management platform) |
Number of employees | 11–50 |
| Website | about.lounge.live |
Lounge is a privately held educational technology company headquartered in New York City. It provides a campus management and student engagement platform tailored for higher education institutions, with a focus on mobile-first design and streamlined student organization.
Lounge offers an all-in-one platform designed to help colleges and universities manage student organizations, events, and community engagement. Its features include:
As of 2025, the company claims that Lounge is used across more than 200 college campuses and by over 300,000 students.
Lounge was founded by Jack Symonds in the early 2020s. The company has released regular updates to its platform based on user feedback.
In 2023, Lounge raised $4 million in seed funding led by Square Peg, with participation from Carthona Capital and other investors.[1][2][3]
In spring 2025, Lounge announced the acquisition of Tikkit, a campus ticketing and fundraising platform founded by Dominic Konstam. The move aimed to expand Lounge's offerings to include integrated event ticketing and fundraising tools.
Lounge has received positive user reviews, particularly for its ease of use and breadth of features. According to the Apple App Store, the platform holds a 5-star rating.[4]
Lounge operates within a competitive ecosystem of campus engagement platforms used by higher education institutions. Comparable solutions in this space include:
These platforms offer various tools for student organization management, event coordination, and community engagement, with each serving different institutional needs and campus sizes.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.