In today's world, Draft:RfaH has become a topic of great relevance and interest to a wide variety of people. Whether due to its impact on society, its influence on popular culture or its relevance in the academic field, Draft:RfaH has positioned itself as a topic of conversation and debate in all areas. In this article, we will explore different aspects related to Draft:RfaH, from its history and evolution to its influence on people's daily lives. In addition, we will analyze different perspectives and opinions on Draft:RfaH, with the aim of offering a global and complete vision of this fascinating topic.
RfaH is transcription elongation factor that uses metamorphic fold-switching.
Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2–3 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 657 pending submissions waiting for review.
If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space.
If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here.
In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally.
Where to get help
If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.
Where to get help
If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.
Comment: I'm not certain this individual protein is notable based on the cited sources. All sources appear to be primary to me, and we typically require secondary sourcing (primary sources are fine for verification but not notability). I also suspect the article is partly LLM-written, which is allowed as long as the output is vetted by a human, but please see WP:MOS because there are some formatting issues that might raise alarm. Specifically, the last two sections should be converted to prose (and shortened, as they are too detailed). But my major reason for declining at this time is the lack of secondary sourcing. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:22, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
RfaH has two main structural domain protein, N-terminal domain (NTD) and C-terminal domain (CTD) which are connected by a flexible linker.[1][9][4][10] The NTDs exhibit mixed α/β topology that comprised of a four-stranded antiparallel β sheet surrounded by two and one α helices on each sides.[5] The CTD has two long antiparallel α helices that form a coiled coil. RfaH CTD is closely linked to the NTD and takes on an all-α fold in the free state. When NTD bound to RNAP, the domains separate and the CTD transform into an all-β fold, while the NTD remains mostly intact. This existence of CTD in two distinct folded states makes RfaH a classic metamorphic or transformer protein.[1][2][5][11][7]
Structural State of RfaH CTD
Rfa CTD transformation from an α-hairpin to a β-barrel.[5]
The CTD of RfaH populates two completely different folded states depending on whether the protein is in its autoinhibited or active form.[9] In the closed, autoinhibited state, the CTD forms a compact two-helical α-hairpin arranged in an antiparallel topology that tightly packs against the NTD.[1][12] This arrangement masks the RNAP-binding interface on the NTD and keeps RfaH inactive until it encounters its specific DNA recruitment signal on the transcription complex. Structural studies show that this α-helical fold is not intrinsically stable on its own; instead, it is stabilized by extensive NTD–CTD interactions, including buried hydrophobic amino acids and a well-defined interface where both domains move as a single rigid body[9][5][13][14]
Upon recruitment of RfaH to the paused transcription elongation complex at the ops hairpin, the NTD engages RNAP and the CTD is forcibly displaced. Once released, the CTD undergoes a dramatic refolding event into a five-stranded β-barrel,[15] topologically equivalent to the NusG-CTD. NMR analyses of isolated CTD[9], along with computational modeling, show that the thermodynamically preferred state in the absence of interaction between NTD and CTD, is the β-barrel.[16][17][18][12] In this β-form, the CTD gains a new functional surface that is required for downstream interactions, particularly with ribosomal protein S10 where it facilitates translation when canonical ribosome recruitment elements is absent.[13][12]
Mechanism of CTD Metamorphosis
The process by which the CTD switches from an α-hairpin to a β-barrel—essentially its “metamorphosis”—is driven by activation of RfaH at the ops-paused transcription complex. When the NTD recognizes the ops sequence, the normally tight interface between the NTD and CTD loosens. This is the key event that “releases” the CTD from its inhibited state. Once released, the α-helical hairpin is no longer stable on its own, so it begins to unfold from an all-α helical hairpin to an all-β strand. This new state enables RfaH to interact with translation machinery[5][2]
When RNAP encounters an operon polarity suppressor (ops) sequence it exposes a DNA hairpin (non-template DNA strand) which serve as signal for the recruitment of RfaH to the paused elongation complex (EC). RfaH NTD then binds to the RNAP leading to the release of CTD.[2][19][20] CTD dissociation triggers its metamorphic fold switching from all-α helical hairpin to an all-β five-stranded β-barrel thereby activating RfaH.[6] The activated RfaH: opsEC complex then moves downstream with RNAP, where the β-CTD recruits ribosomal protein S10, enabling RfaH to assemble a transcription–translationexpressome and promote processive transcription of long operons. Transcription is terminated when RNAP arrives at the operon terminal. This leads to the dissociation of RfaH from the complex, allowing the CTD to refold back into the α-helical state and rebind the NTD.[2][5]
Biological Importance and Implication
RfaH is a primary transcription elongation factor that prevents premature termination of specific operons by binding to the transcription elongation complex and enhancing RNAP processivity. It prevent RNAP pausing and counteracts Rho-dependent termination, thereby suppressing transcriptional polarity and allowing efficient expression of distal genes within long operons.[6][9][20][21] RfaH can also interact with the ribosome 30S subunit and components of the translation initiation machinery, enabling translation initiation complex formation to scan the nascent mRNA.[2] Due to its C-terminal domain fold switching from an all-α helices in autoinhibited state to a β-barrel in the active state, it underlies the transition from a transcription-focused factor to a translation factor.[1][2][5][22]
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.