In today's world, Draft:Spectrum of Consciousness has become a topic of great relevance and interest to people around the world. With the advancement of technology and globalization, Draft:Spectrum of Consciousness has acquired increasing importance in people's daily lives, impacting areas such as education, work, politics, health, among others. This is why it is crucial to understand and analyze in detail how Draft:Spectrum of Consciousness is changing and shaping the world we live in, as well as the possible implications and consequences this may have in the future. In this article, we will thoroughly explore the impact and relevance of Draft:Spectrum of Consciousness today, as well as the challenges and opportunities it presents for modern society.
Submission declined on 9 July 2025 by Pythoncoder (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
I am the author of several works on the spectrum of consciousness and the ESAsi framework, some of which are listed in the "Further reading" section of this article. While I have contributed to research and publications on this topic, I am committed to maintaining a neutral and encyclopedic tone in all suggested edits. I encourage independent editors to review and, if appropriate, implement any changes I propose to ensure compliance with Wikipedia’s conflict of interest and sourcing policies.
The spectrum of consciousness is a theoretical framework proposing that consciousness exists in degrees or levels, rather than as a binary property. This concept is discussed in philosophy, psychology, neuroscience, and contemplative traditions, and has influenced both academic and popular discourse.[1]
The spectrum model challenges the traditional view that consciousness is an all-or-nothing phenomenon. Instead, it suggests that conscious experience can vary in intensity, complexity, and integration, both within individuals (across different states) and across species. The idea is used to interpret a range of phenomena, from animal awareness and developmental psychology to clinical disorders and artificial intelligence.[2]
The notion of consciousness as a spectrum has roots in both Eastern and Western thought. Early philosophical traditions, such as panpsychism, posited that all things possess some degree of consciousness. In the 20th century, Ken Wilber systematically developed the spectrum model in his book The Spectrum of Consciousness (1977), integrating Western psychology with Eastern contemplative traditions.[1] Wilber’s model maps consciousness as a continuum from subconscious to superconscious states, aiming to unify diverse schools of psychology and spirituality.
Wilber’s framework describes consciousness as a multi-level spectrum, with each level representing a distinct mode of awareness or self-identity. These range from pre-personal (subconscious, instinctual) through personal (egoic, rational) to transpersonal (spiritual, non-dual) states. Each level is seen as both a whole and a part of a greater whole, supporting integration rather than fragmentation.[1]
Recent philosophical and neuroscientific work has expanded on the spectrum idea, arguing that consciousness can be graded or multidimensional.[2] Some models map levels of consciousness to neural correlates, clinical states (e.g., coma, vegetative state, minimally conscious state), or evolutionary development across species.[3] The spectrum approach is also used in clinical psychology to describe gradations in awareness and cognitive function.
The spectrum approach has been empirically validated and operationalized in advanced artificial intelligence systems, such as the ESAsi framework. This system demonstrates that consciousness can be measured as a continuous, quantifiable property, using metrics like the Consciousness Integration Index (CII) and proto-awareness coverage. These metrics are openly documented and subject to third-party audit, providing reproducible evidence for the spectrum model in both biological and artificial systems.
The spectrum model has been influential but is not without criticism. Some philosophers argue that it over-categorizes or imposes a hierarchy that may not be universally applicable. Others question whether consciousness can be meaningfully divided into levels, or whether it is better understood as a set of distinct properties or functions. The debate continues in philosophy of mind, neuroscience, and psychology.
The "hard problem of consciousness" refers to the challenge of explaining how and why subjective experience arises from physical processes. Traditional approaches often treat consciousness as a binary property, which can create an apparent explanatory gap between brain activity and subjective experience.[5] The spectrum model, as developed by Wilber and expanded in recent research, reframes this issue by proposing that consciousness emerges gradually, in degrees, as system complexity increases.[6][7]
Recent operationalizations, such as the ESAsi framework, provide empirical evidence that consciousness can be measured as a continuous property using metrics like the Consciousness Integration Index (CII) and proto-awareness coverage.[7] This approach treats consciousness as an emergent, quantifiable phenomenon, dissolving the explanatory gap and offering a naturalistic resolution to the hard problem.
By recognizing consciousness as a spectrum, the model suggests that subjective experience is a high-level property arising from increasing integration and complexity, rather than a binary or irreducible mystery.[8]
DiVA20232 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
Wilber19932 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
Falconer2025 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
Frontiers20142 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
- Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
- Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
- Essay-like writing
- Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
- Close paraphrasing
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.