Federalist No. 79
In today's article, we want to explore the topic of Federalist No. 79 in depth. Throughout history, Federalist No. 79 has played a fundamental role in various areas, from politics to science, culture and art. It is a topic that has generated debate and controversy, but has also been a source of inspiration and innovation. In this article, we will analyze the different aspects related to Federalist No. 79, from its origins to its impact on today's society. With expert interviews, recent research and personal reflections, we will delve into the exciting world of Federalist No. 79 to better understand its relevance and influence in the contemporary world. Don't miss this fascinating tour of Federalist No. 79!
 Alexander Hamilton, author of Federalist No. 79 | |
| Author | Alexander Hamilton |
|---|---|
| Original title | The Judiciary Continued |
| Country | United States |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | The Independent Journal, New York Packet, The Daily Advertiser |
Publication date | May 28, 1788 |
| Media type | Newspaper |
| Preceded by | Federalist No. 78 |
| Followed by | Federalist No. 80 |
Federalist No. 79 is an essay by Alexander Hamilton, the seventy-ninth of The Federalist Papers. It was published in a book collection on May 28, 1788, but first appeared in a newspaper, where most readers would have seen it, on June 18 of that year. It appeared under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist papers were published whether they were written by Hamilton, John Jay, or James Madison. Its title is "The Judiciary Continued", and it is the second in a series of six essays discussing the powers and limitations of the judicial branch.
Publius' argument
In Federalist No. 78, Hamilton argued that "permanence in office," as enshrined in lifelong appointments, was the most important guarantee of the independence of the judiciary. In No. 79 he states that the other main guarantee of that independence is the provision in the proposed Constitution of the United States for the financial independence of judges. Hamilton also argues that the ability of Congress to impeach judges provides protection against their misconduct despite their relative independence.
External links
 | This article on The Federalist Papers is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |