In this article we are going to explore the fascinating history of Finite difference methods for option pricing, a topic that has captured the attention of millions of people over the years. From its origins to its impact on today's society, Finite difference methods for option pricing has played a crucial role in shaping our way of understanding the world. Throughout this article, we will examine in detail the most relevant aspects of Finite difference methods for option pricing, from its first manifestations to the most recent innovations that have revolutionized the way we perceive it. Additionally, we will discover how Finite difference methods for option pricing has left his mark on popular culture, influencing everything from art and fashion to politics and technology. Get ready to immerse yourself in the exciting universe of Finite difference methods for option pricing and discover everything this phenomenon has to offer us.
Finite difference methods for option pricing are numerical methods used in mathematical finance for the valuation of options. Finite difference methods were first applied to option pricing by Eduardo Schwartz in 1977.: 180
In general, finite difference methods are used to price options by approximating the (continuous-time) differential equation that describes how an option price evolves over time by a set of (discrete-time) difference equations. The discrete difference equations may then be solved iteratively to calculate a price for the option. The approach arises since the evolution of the option value can be modelled via a partial differential equation (PDE), as a function of (at least) time and price of underlying; see for example the Black–Scholes PDE. Once in this form, a finite difference model can be derived, and the valuation obtained.
The approach can be used to solve derivative pricing problems that have, in general, the same level of complexity as those problems solved by tree approaches.
As above, the PDE is expressed in a discretized form, using finite differences, and the evolution in the option price is then modelled using a lattice with corresponding dimensions: time runs from 0 to maturity; and price runs from 0 to a "high" value, such that the option is deeply in or out of the money. The option is then valued as follows:
As above, these methods can solve derivative pricing problems that have, in general, the same level of complexity as those problems solved by tree approaches, but, given their relative complexity, are usually employed only when other approaches are inappropriate; an example here, being changing interest rates and / or time linked dividend policy. At the same time, like tree-based methods, this approach is limited in terms of the number of underlying variables, and for problems with multiple dimensions, Monte Carlo methods for option pricing are usually preferred. : 182 Note that, when standard assumptions are applied, the explicit technique encompasses the binomial- and trinomial tree methods. Tree based methods, then, suitably parameterized, are a special case of the explicit finite difference method.