In today's world, Gap theorem is a relevant issue that impacts a large number of people in different aspects of their lives. Whether on an individual, societal or global level, Gap theorem has gained significant importance and has generated a wide range of opinions and debates. In this article, we will delve into the world of Gap theorem to analyze its origin, evolution and consequences. We will discover how Gap theorem has marked a before and after in today's society and we will explore possible solutions and alternatives to address this issue effectively. Join us on this journey to better understand the importance of Gap theorem in our world today.
In computational complexity theory, the gap theorem, also known as the Borodin–Trakhtenbrot gap theorem, is a major theorem about the complexity of computable functions.[1]
It essentially states that there are arbitrarily large computable gaps in the hierarchy of complexity classes. For any computable function that represents an increase in computational resources, one can find a resource bound such that the set of functions computable within the expanded resource bound is the same as the set computable within the original bound.
The theorem was proved independently by Boris Trakhtenbrot[2] and Allan Borodin.[3][4] Although Trakhtenbrot's derivation preceded Borodin's by several years, it was not known nor recognized in the West until after Borodin's work was published.
As an introductory example, suppose that we are considering time complexity of a certain specific Turing machine model. The set is the set of total computable functions, such that there exists some implementation of the function that computes it in time given an input size of .
In general, any total computable function defines some time complexity class, and we expect that if is much larger than , for all , then should be larger than . The gap theorem states that this is not necessarily so. Indeed, for any total computable such that for all , there exists some total computable function , such that . Intuitively, adding compute time might not allow us to compute more functions.
More generally, suppose Φ is an abstract (Blum) complexity measure, then for any total computable function g for which for every x, there is a total computable function t such that with respect to Φ, the complexity classes with boundary functions t and are identical.
For the special case of time complexity, this can be stated more simply as:
Similarly for the special case of space complexity.
Because the bound may be very large (and often will be nonconstructible) the gap theorem does not imply anything interesting for complexity classes such as P or NP,[5] and it does not contradict the time hierarchy theorem or space hierarchy theorem.[6]
Fortunately, the gap phenomenon cannot happen for time bounds t that anyone would ever be interested in.