Today, Goods and services is a topic of great relevance and interest in society. For a long time, Goods and services has been the subject of study and debate in different fields and disciplines. Its importance lies in its direct impact on people's daily lives, as well as its influence in political, cultural, economic and social spheres. In this article, we will explore different aspects and perspectives related to Goods and services, analyzing its evolution over time and its relevance today. In addition, we will reflect on possible challenges and opportunities that Goods and services presents in the current context. Through a multidisciplinary approach, we will seek to provide a comprehensive view on Goods and services and its importance in contemporary society.
This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. (June 2015) |
Goods are items that are usually (but not always) tangible, such as pens or pears. Services are activities provided by other people, such as teachers or barbers. Taken together, it is the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services which underpins all economic activity and trade. According to economic theory, consumption of goods and services is assumed to provide utility (satisfaction) to the consumer or end-user, although businesses also consume goods and services in the course of producing their own.
Physiocratic economists categorized production into productive labour and unproductive labour. Adam Smith expanded this thought by arguing that any economic activities directly related to material products (goods) were productive, and those activities which involved non-material production (services) were unproductive. This emphasis on material production was adapted by David Ricardo, Thomas Robert Malthus and John Stuart Mill, and influenced later Marxian economics. Other, mainly Italian, 18th-century economists maintained that all desired goods and services were productive.[1]

The division of consumables into services is a simplification: these are not discrete categories. Most business theorists see a continuum with pure service at one endpoint and pure tangible commodity goods at the other. Most products fall between these two extremes. For example, a restaurant provides a physical good (prepared food), but also provides services in the form of ambience, the setting and clearing of the table, etc. Although some utilities, such as electricity and communications service providers, exclusively provide services, other utilities deliver physical goods, such as water utilities. For public sector contracting purposes, the electricity supply is defined among goods rather than services in the European Union,[2] whereas under United States federal procurement regulations, it is treated as a service.[3]
Goods are normally structural and can be transferred in an instant while services are delivered over a period of time. Goods can be returned while a service, once delivered cannot.[4] Goods are not always tangible and may be virtual e.g. a book may be paper or electronic.
Marketing theory makes use of the service-goods continuum as an important concept[5] which "enables marketers to see the relative goods/services composition of total products".[6]
Distinctions are made between goods and services in the context of international trade liberalization. For example, the World Trade Organization's General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) covers international trade in goods[7] and the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) covers the services sector.[8]