In today's world, Hamilton v. Alabama (1961) has become a topic of great relevance and interest to a wide spectrum of people and organizations. Whether due to its impact on society, its historical relevance or its influence on daily life, Hamilton v. Alabama (1961) has captured the attention of experts and the curious alike. In this article, we will explore the different facets of Hamilton v. Alabama (1961), from its origins to its evolution today, analyzing its influence in various areas and reflecting on its importance for the future. Hamilton v. Alabama (1961) is a fascinating topic that invites us to reflect and question our perceptions, and we are excited to delve into its study in the pages that follow.
Hamilton v. Alabama | |
---|---|
Argued October 17, 1961 Decided November 13, 1961 | |
Full case name | Hamilton v. Alabama |
Citations | 368 U.S. 52 (more) 82 S. Ct. 157; 7 L. Ed. 2d 114; 1961 U.S. LEXIS 167 |
Case history | |
Prior | Ex parte Hamilton, 271 Ala. 88, 122 So. 2d 602 (1960), cert. granted, 364 U.S. 931 (1961). |
Holding | |
Absence of counsel for petitioner at the time of his arraignment violated his rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Douglas, joined by unanimous |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. XIV |
Hamilton v. Alabama, 368 U.S. 52 (1961), was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States. Hamilton was charged in an Alabama court with breaking and entering a dwelling at night with intent to ravish, and had pleaded not guilty. He had then been convicted and sentenced to death. The Court ruled unanimously that the absence of counsel at the time of his arraignment violated Hamilton's due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.