This article will address the topic of Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of California, which is extremely relevant and interesting today. Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of California is a topic that has generated great debate and has captured the attention of many people in different fields. Throughout history, Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of California has been the object of study, analysis and reflection, which has contributed to its evolution and understanding in a current context. Furthermore, Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of California has played a significant role in the lives of many people, directly or indirectly impacting various aspects of society. Therefore, it is essential to explore and delve into the importance and relevance of Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of California, as well as its implications and consequences today.
This article needs additional citations for verification. (February 2015) |
Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal. | |
---|---|
Argued October 21, 1971 Decided March 1, 1972 | |
Full case name | Hawaii v. Standard Oil Company of California, et al. |
Citations | 405 U.S. 251 (more) 92 S.Ct. 885; 31 L. Ed. 2d 184; 1972 U.S. LEXIS 111 |
Case history | |
Prior | 431 F.2d 1282; 1970 Trade Cases ¶ 73,340 (9th Cir. 1970) |
Holding | |
Section 4 of the Clayton Act does not authorize a State to sue for damages for an injury to its general economy allegedly attributable to a violation of the antitrust laws. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Marshall, joined by Burger, Stewart, White, Blackmun |
Dissent | Douglas |
Dissent | Brennan, joined by Douglas |
Powell, Rehnquist took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. |
Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal., 405 U.S. 251 (1972), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that Section 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act does not authorize a U.S. state to sue for damages for an injury to its general economy allegedly attributable to a violation of the United States antitrust law.