Impediment to expulsion

In this article we will address Impediment to expulsion, a topic that has captured the attention and interest of people from various areas and profiles. Impediment to expulsion is a widely debated topic that has given rise to conflicting opinions, generating a wide spectrum of analysis, discussions and reflections. Since its inception, Impediment to expulsion has been the object of study, research and speculation, arousing curiosity and concern in those who seek to understand, deepen and understand its implications and consequences. Over the years, Impediment to expulsion has evolved and has positioned itself as a relevant topic in various contexts, covering social, political, economic, scientific and cultural aspects. In this article, we will explore different perspectives, approaches and debates related to Impediment to expulsion, with the aim of offering a comprehensive and enriching vision of this exciting topic.

Impediment to expulsion, or prohibition of deportation, are practical or legal barriers that prevents a country from enforcing an expulsion or deportation decision of a non-national. In some countries and cases, a person who has been asylum seeker but has received negative decision, may still be entitled to reside in the country where the person has applied for a residence permit due to such impediments, and may get a temporary or permanent residence permit. In other countries and cases, the person would be considered an undocumented (also known as illegal or irregular) immigrant, or may be in an undefined legal state.

Examples of impediments to expulsion in certain countries are:

  • The home country refuses to receive the person.
  • The foreigner's identity was not established.
  • Transport is not possible.
  • Serious difficulties would arise due to the foreigner's health condition
  • New asylum reasons occur after the deportation decision, with reference to the principle of non-refoulement in the international Refugee Convention. The European Court of Human Rights, referring to the European Convention on Human Rights, has shown in a number of indicative judgments that there are enforcement barriers to expulsion to certain countries, for example due to the risk of torture.

References

  1. ^ "Impediments to the expulsion of non-nationals - Research Portal | Lancaster University".
  2. ^ http://www.emnsweden.se/download/18.5bc6881815e14db67502902/1512135890805/EMN-AHQ_2017.1188_SE_practical_impediments_of_enforcement_and_residence_for_tcns.pdf [bare URL PDF]
  3. ^ "Refugees and asylum seekers: Humanitarian migration in Germany | European immigration migration law | News". www.migrationsrecht.net. 2014-09-08. Archived from the original on 2014-09-08. Retrieved 2022-02-05.
  4. ^ "fulltext":} Search results on "Impediment to expulsion" in the European Court of Human Rights archive