Tu banner alternativo

Intellectual property analytics

Intellectual property analytics's theme is one that has captured the attention and curiosity of many people over the years. It is a topic that has generated debate, discussion and reflection in various spheres of society. From the academic field to the popular field, Intellectual property analytics has been the object of study, analysis and exploration. As society advances and evolves, the interest and relevance of Intellectual property analytics continues to constantly change, expanding into new areas and raising new questions. In this article, we will thoroughly explore the importance and impact of Intellectual property analytics in different contexts, as well as its influence on our daily lives.

Tu banner alternativo

Intellectual property analytics (commonly IP analytics) is the systematic analysis of data from intellectual property rights, including patents, trademarks, industrial designs, copyrights, geographical indications, and trade secrets to produce actionable insights for policy makers, businesses, researchers and legal practitioners.[1] Originating in patent analytics, the field has expanded to integrate multiple IP domains and combines rigorous data preparation with techniques such as bibliometrics, text mining, machine learning, geospatial mapping and visualization to create technology landscapes, monitor brand activity, assess portfolios and inform policy.[2] Typical workflows progress from project scoping through data acquisition, cleaning and normalization to analysis, storytelling and dissemination, using both public and commercial databases and tools. Some advances in artificial intelligence have broadened analytical capabilities while raising legal and ethical questions about authorship, inventorship and liability, driving evolving methodological standards and regulatory debate.

Context

The emergence of IP analytics as a distinct field has been driven in part by the unprecedented availability of machine-readable data from global IP offices, scholarly databases, and open source tools.[3][4] According to WIPO’s Patent Analytics Handbook,[5] patent analytics now routinely involves scientific literature integration, text mining, machine learning, and geographic mapping for strategic insight generation.[6] The field has evolved from early spreadsheet analyses to sophisticated pipelines that leverage APIs, geocoding, and AI for technology mapping and forecasting,[2][7][8] including automated systems for patent document summarization using natural language processing and machine learning for enhanced knowledge management.[9]

As reported in IP Facts and Figures 2024,[10] global filings for patents, trademarks, and industrial designs reached new highs in 2023—with over 3.5 million patent applications, 1.52 million industrial designs, and roughly 15 million trademark class based filings—demonstrating the scale of IP activity now available for analytics. This vast data resource is now exploited via tools like the USPTO’s PatentsView,[11] which links and disambiguates inventors, organizations, and filings, and applies algorithms—such as gender attribution—to enrich analytical capacity.

Academic literature has chronicled the growing convergence of patent landscape analysis with data science and AI methods.[12][2] Patent analytics is now understood to encompass not only counts and citation graphs, but also semantic clustering, named entity recognition, and predictive modeling, as described in peer-reviewed studies.

While the initial focus of IP analytics was on patents, recent developments in trademark and design analytics—arguably driven by similar data intensive techniques—underscore a broader shift toward integrated analysis across IP rights.[13] This expansion enables strategic comparisons across patent, trademark, industrial design, and other IP domains for portfolio management, commercialization strategy, and policy formulation.[14] While offering immense opportunities for advanced analytics, the rapid emergence of generative AI also presents complex challenges to traditional intellectual property notions of authorship, inventorship, and infringement liability, necessitating evolving legal and ethical frameworks.[15]

The main Intellectual Property domains

Patent analytics

Patent analytics is a specialized domain within IP analytics that extracts insights from patent documents to inform decisions in research and development, technology management, policymaking, and competitive intelligence.[14] A patent contains structured information such as technical disclosures, legal claims, bibliographic data (inventors, applicants, jurisdictions), classifications, and citation relationships. Because patents are often filed before commercial products are launched, they serve as early indicators of innovation trajectories.[16]

Patent analytics supports:

  • Technology landscaping, identifying emerging fields, convergence zones, and innovation cycles, as annually detailed in comprehensive reports from major patent offices outlining key technological shifts and leading sectors;[17][18]
  • Portfolio management, including benchmarking, white space analysis, and IP strategy alignment;
  • Patent valuation and quality assessment, using indicators such as forward citations, patent family size, grant status, and opposition records;[19]
  • Policy analysis, assessing national and regional innovation systems;[20]
  • Academic studies, tracing the science-technology linkage and knowledge diffusion.[21]

Patent data can be accessed through open platforms such as WIPO's PATENTSCOPE, EPO's Espacenet, and the USPTO bulk data portal. For large-scale analysis, EPO’s PATSTAT offers structured data exports compatible with statistical software. Commercial platforms like Derwent Innovation, Orbit Intelligence, and Lens.org offer enhanced search, normalization, and visualization capabilities.

Analytical techniques in patent studies include:

Recent research emphasizes integrating patent analytics with scientific publication data, market data, and standards to build multi-dimensional technology intelligence systems.[21] Patent analytics also plays a critical role in sustainability assessments, pharmaceutical innovation, green technologies, and artificial intelligence trend monitoring, as evidenced by major reports on innovation in clean energy technologies, and through specific patent analyses leveraging AI to identify climate change mitigation trends.[26][27] The field further offers critical insights into global trends in biotechnology innovation, often revealing significant growth and emerging frontiers in areas like genetic engineering and AI-integrated biotech tools.[28][29]

Trademark analytics

Trademark analytics examines trademark registrations and applications to gain insights into branding strategies, market dynamics, and product trends.[13] WIPO's Global Brand Database and annual World Intellectual Property Indicators reports provide large-scale trademark data across Nice classifications, jurisdictions, and time periods.

Trademark analytics can be used to:

  • Monitor brand activity in specific sectors or regions;[30]
  • Detect filing surges, signaling new market entrants or rebranding trends;
  • Identify potential infringement or conflicts, using similarity algorithms;
  • Support market entry analysis, evaluating competitor strategies, including the analysis of trademark families and their market value implications.

The increase in cross-border commerce and e-commerce platforms has enhanced the strategic use of trademark data for global brand monitoring.[citation needed]

Industrial design analytics

Industrial design analytics focuses on the appearance of products, as protected under registered designs. It relies on visual and classification data derived from systems such as the Hague System and the Locarno Classification. WIPO's Global Design Database facilitates international and regional design searches.

Applications include:

  • Trend spotting in product aesthetics, especially in design-intensive sectors like consumer electronics, fashion, or automotive;
  • Monitoring design registrations by competitors or markets;
  • Tracking geographical diffusion, via design filings across jurisdictions.

Design analytics remains more specialized due to the visual nature of data and limitations in text-based querying.[31] Nonetheless, design filing trends provide valuable insight into innovation in product form and appearance. Recent methodological advances are beginning to overcome data challenges, using computer vision and AI to enable large-scale analysis of design aesthetics and trends, including deep learning techniques for image-based trademark similarity detection, and artificial intelligence is also increasingly shaping the entire industrial design process, from concept generation to optimization, presenting both significant opportunities and new challenges.[citation needed]

Other IP analytics

IP analytics may also extend to other forms of protection, such as geographical indications (GIs), plant variety protections, or copyright registrations where available. For instance, WIPO's Lisbon System and annual IP statistics include GI filings, while plant variety databases offer insight into agricultural innovation. However, these forms are less standardized globally, and lack the robust analytical infrastructure of patents or trademarks.

IP analytics methodology

The analytical process in IP analytics typically follows a structured methodology, as described in WIPO's guidelines for patent analytics.[16]

This six-stage process is applicable across patent, trademark, and design analysis:

  • Defining the topic and project scope, the technology, sector, or legal issue to be analyzed. Scope may be limited by timeframe, geography, or classification systems (e.g., International Patent Classification, Nice classification, Locarno classification).
  • IP search and data retrieval from relevant databases to collect intellectual property records. This may involve using structured fields, keywords, classifications, or citation links. Tools include WIPO's Patentscope, Global Brand Database, Global Design Database, and EPO's Espacenet and PATSTAT.[32]
  • Data cleaning and normalization to ensure data quality by removing duplicates, harmonizing applicant names, assigning missing classifications, and aligning with international standards. This is essential for producing reliable visualizations and statistics.[6]
  • Data analysis and visualization with the use of bibliometric, network, statistical, and machine learning methods to derive insights. Common approaches include: time-series analysis, citation and co-classification networks, geographic heat maps[8] or applicant or inventor ranking
  • Narrative and storytelling Interpret the results in the context of the research question. It combines visuals with clear text to communicate insights effectively to stakeholders, policymakers, industry, or legal experts.[16]
  • Dissemination and distribution by publishing findings through reports, dashboards, academic papers, internal briefings, interactive platforms or open datasets.

References

  1. ^ Mejia, Cristian; Kajikawa, Yuya (2025-01-08). "Patent research in academic literature. Landscape and trends with a focus on patent analytics". Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. 9 1484685. doi:10.3389/frma.2024.1484685. ISSN 2504-0537. PMC 11751822. PMID 39844863.
  2. ^ a b c Aristodemou, Leonidas; Tietze, Frank (2018-12-01). "The state-of-the-art on Intellectual Property Analytics (IPA): A literature review on artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning methods for analysing intellectual property (IP) data". World Patent Information. Advanced Analytics of Intellectual Property Information for TechMining. 55: 37–51. Bibcode:2018WPatI..55...37A. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2018.07.002. ISSN 0172-2190.
  3. ^ Chuprat, Suriayati; Novianto, Evan Hanif Dwi; Matsuura, Yoshiyuki; Mahdzir, Akbariah Mohd; Harun, Aizul Nahar (2024-07-01). "A closer look on patent analytics through systematic literature review". Management Review Quarterly. doi:10.1007/s11301-024-00452-x. ISSN 2198-1639.
  4. ^ "WIPO Patent Analytics: WIPO Analytics". WIPO Patent Analytics. Retrieved 2025-07-26.
  5. ^ Oldham, Paul. The WIPO Patent Analytics Handbook.
  6. ^ a b Squicciarini, M.; Demis, H.; Criscuolo, C. (2013-06-05). "Measuring Patent Quality: Indicators of Technological and Economic Value". OECD. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. OECD Science, Technology and Industry - Working Papers. doi:10.1787/5k4522wkw1r8-en. Retrieved 2025-07-26.
  7. ^ World Intellectual Property Organization. (2024). "Patent Landscape Report - Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)". WIPO Patent Analytics. doi:10.34667/tind.49740.
  8. ^ a b de Rassenfosse, Gaétan; Kozak, Jan; Seliger, Florian (2019-11-06). "Geocoding of worldwide patent data". Scientific Data. 6 (1): 260. Bibcode:2019NatSD...6..260D. doi:10.1038/s41597-019-0264-6. ISSN 2052-4463. PMC 6834584. PMID 31695047.
  9. ^ Trippe, Anthony (2015). "Guidelines for Preparing Patent Landscape Reports" (PDF). wipo.int.
  10. ^ "IP Facts and Figures 2024". IP Facts and Figures.
  11. ^ "PatentsView". www.uspto.gov. Retrieved 2025-07-26.
  12. ^ Kitsara, Irene (29 January 2018). "Stages, Tasks, Workflow and Tools in the preparation of Patent Landscape Reports". WIPO Github. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
  13. ^ a b Castaldi, Carolina (2020-08-01). "All the great things you can do with trademark data: Taking stock and looking ahead". Strategic Organization. 18 (3): 472–484. doi:10.1177/1476127019847835. ISSN 1476-1270.
  14. ^ a b Ernst, Holger (2003-01-15). "Patent information for strategic technology management". World Patent Information. 25 (3): 233–242. Bibcode:2003WPatI..25..233E. doi:10.1016/S0172-2190(03)00077-2.
  15. ^ "OECD Patent Statistics Manual". OECD. 2009-02-04. Retrieved 2025-07-26.
  16. ^ a b c Tseng, Yuen-Hsien; Lin, Chi-Jen; Lin, Yu-I (2007-09-01). "Text mining techniques for patent analysis". Information Processing & Management. Patent Processing. 43 (5): 1216–1247. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2006.11.011. ISSN 0306-4573.
  17. ^ Adel, Michael E.; Harrison, Christopher (2024-03-01). "Unravelling technology meta-landscapes: A patent analytics approach to assess trajectories and fragmentation". World Patent Information. 76 102256. Bibcode:2024WPatI..7602256A. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2023.102256. ISSN 0172-2190.
  18. ^ "Patent Index 2024". epo.org. European Patent Office. 2025.
  19. ^ Hu, Zewen; Zhou, Xiji; Lin, Angela (2023-05-01). "Evaluation and identification of potential high-value patents in the field of integrated circuits using a multidimensional patent indicators pre-screening strategy and machine learning approaches". Journal of Informetrics. 17 (2) 101406. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2023.101406. ISSN 1751-1577.
  20. ^ "An Overview of Patent Analytics Tools - Paul Oldham's Analytics Blog". www.pauloldham.net. Retrieved 2025-07-26.
  21. ^ a b Narin, Francis (2011-07-15). "The increasing linkage between US technology and public science". Research Policy. 26 (3): 317–330. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00013-9.
  22. ^ Morales, Pablo; Flikkema, Meindert; Castaldi, Carolina; de Man, Ard-Pieter (2024-10-15). "When do trademarks improve the measurement of innovation? An analysis of innovations from Dutch SMEs". Science and Public Policy. 51 (5): 923–938. doi:10.1093/scipol/scae035. ISSN 0302-3427.
  23. ^ Trappey, Amy J. C.; Trappey, Charles V.; Govindarajan, Usharani Hareesh; Sun, John J. H. (2021-10-15). "Patent Value Analysis Using Deep Learning Models—The Case of IoT Technology Mining for the Manufacturing Industry". IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 68 (5): 1334–1346. Bibcode:2021ITEM...68.1334T. doi:10.1109/TEM.2019.2957842. ISSN 1558-0040.
  24. ^ Mina, A.; Ramlogan, R.; Tampubolon, G.; Metcalfe, J. S. (2007-06-01). "Mapping evolutionary trajectories: Applications to the growth and transformation of medical knowledge". Research Policy. 36 (5): 789–806. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.12.007. ISSN 0048-7333.
  25. ^ Alshowaish, Hayfa; Al-Ohali, Yousef; Al-Nafjan, Abeer (2022-02-08). "Trademark Image Similarity Detection Using Convolutional Neural Network". Applied Sciences. 12 (3) 1752. doi:10.3390/app12031752. ISSN 2076-3417.
  26. ^ Viets, Alexander; Schäper, Thomas; Tietze, Frank; Leker, Jens (2025-07-15). "Advancing Patent Litigation Analysis: An LLM-Based Analysis of Rationales and Performance Outcomes". Academy of Management Proceedings. 2025 (1): 12804. doi:10.5465/AMPROC.2025.330bp (inactive 4 November 2025). ISSN 0065-0668.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2025 (link)
  27. ^ Podrecca, Matteo; Culot, Giovanna; Tavassoli, Sam; Orzes, Guido (2024). "Artificial Intelligence for Climate Change: A Patent Analysis in the Manufacturing Sector". IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 71: 15005–15024. Bibcode:2024ITEM...7115005P. doi:10.1109/TEM.2024.3469370. hdl:10446/286809. ISSN 0018-9391.
  28. ^ "Patent Analytics". wipo.int. Retrieved 2025-11-04.
  29. ^ "Patent Landscape Report - Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)". Patent Landscape Report.
  30. ^ Mendonça, Sandro; Pereira, Tiago Santos; Godinho, Manuel Mira (2004-11-01). "Trademarks as an indicator of innovation and industrial change". Research Policy. What do we know Innovation? Selected papers from an International Conference in honour of Keith Pavitt. 33 (9): 1385–1404. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.09.005. ISSN 0048-7333.
  31. ^ "A review of AI application trends in industrial design". rua.ua.es. Retrieved 2025-10-29.
  32. ^ Oldham, Paul. Chapter 1 Introduction | The WIPO Patent Analytics Handbook.