International Association of Innovation Professionals

In this article, we will explore the various facets of International Association of Innovation Professionals, a topic that has captured the curiosity and interest of numerous people over time. From its impact on modern society to its relevance in history, International Association of Innovation Professionals has played a fundamental role in different aspects of our lives. Through an exhaustive analysis, we will delve into the nuances and dimensions of International Association of Innovation Professionals, exposing its importance and influence in different areas. Likewise, we will examine the different perspectives that exist around International Association of Innovation Professionals, thus allowing a broader and more complete understanding of this very relevant topic.

International Association of Innovation Professionals
AbbreviationIAOIP-GIMI
Founded atUnited States
TypeNon-profit
Region served
Worldwide
Membership
14000
Co-President
Brett Trusko, Hitendra Patel
Key people
Ronald Jonash, Erila Haska
Websitewww.giminstitute.org

The International Association of Innovation Professionals (IAOIP) is a professional association for innovation professionals with 4,000 members in more than 100 countries as of 2021.

The International Association of Innovation Professionals (IAOIP) announced in August 2023 that it would merge with the Global Innovation Management Institute (GIMI) based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States.

Journal

International Journal of Innovation Science
DisciplineInnovation
LanguageEnglish
Edited byEnglish
Publication details
Publisher
FrequencyQuarterly
Standard abbreviations
ISO 4Int. J. Innov. Sci.
Indexing
ISSN1757-2223
LCCN2017208535
OCLC no.1062086374
Links

The International Journal of Innovation Science is published by GIMI-IAOIP. The journal has published articles on topics such as user innovation, role of diversity in innovation, and design theory. The journal is indexed in Scopus and Web of Science.

See also

References

  1. ^ Michaelis, Timothy L.; Markham, Stephen K. (2017). "Innovation Training". Research-Technology Management. 60 (2): 36–42. doi:10.1080/08956308.2017.1276387. S2CID 157816753.
  2. ^ Nadan, Joseph S. (2014). "Using innovation science to minimize entrepreneurial risk". 2014 IEEE Innovations in Technology Conference. pp. 1–7. doi:10.1109/InnoTek.2014.6877372. ISBN 978-1-4799-3842-1. S2CID 22527767.
  3. ^ Landry, Dana J. (2016). "The case for certification of the innovation professional". International Journal of Innovation Science. 8: 27–38. doi:10.1108/IJIS-03-2016-002.
  4. ^ von Hippel, Eric (2005). "Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation". Journal für Betriebswirtschaft. 55: 63–78. doi:10.1007/s11301-004-0002-8.
  5. ^ Ozgen, Ceren; Nijkamp, Peter; Poot, Jacques (2013). "The impact of cultural diversity on firm innovation: Evidence from Dutch micro-data". IZA Journal of Migration. 2: 18. doi:10.1186/2193-9039-2-18. hdl:10289/8147. S2CID 47014298.
  6. ^ Beckman, Sara; Barry, Michael (2009). "Design and Innovation through Storytelling". International Journal of Innovation Science. 1 (4): 151–160. doi:10.1260/1757-2223.1.4.151.
  7. ^ "Scopus preview - Scopus - International Journal of Innovation Science".
  8. ^ "Web of Science Master Journal List - WoS MJL by Clarivate".