Laser flash analysis
In today's world, Laser flash analysis is a highly relevant topic that impacts everyone in different ways. Whether it's a hot topic, an influencer, or a broad concept, Laser flash analysis has sparked debates and captured the attention of society as a whole. In this article, we will deeply explore Laser flash analysis and analyze its impact in various areas, from politics to popular culture. Additionally, we will examine how Laser flash analysis has evolved over time and how it continues to be a relevant topic today.
 |
The laser flash analysis or laser flash method is used to measure thermal diffusivity of a variety of different materials. An energy pulse heats one side of a plane-parallel sample and the resulting time dependent temperature rise on the backside due to the energy input is detected. The higher the thermal diffusivity of the sample, the faster the energy reaches the backside. A laser flash apparatus (LFA) to measure thermal diffusivity over a broad temperature range, is shown on the right hand side.
In a one-dimensional, adiabatic case the thermal diffusivity is calculated from this temperature rise as follows:
Where
- is the thermal diffusivity in cm2/s
- is the thickness of the sample in cm
- is the time to the half maximum in s
As the coefficient 0.1388 is dimensionless, the formula works also for and in their corresponding SI units.
Measurement principle
The laser flash method was developed by Parker et al. in 1961.[1] In a vertical setup, a light source (e.g. laser, flashlamp) heats the sample from the bottom side and a detector on top detects the time-dependent temperature rise. For measuring the thermal diffusivity, which is strongly temperature-dependent, at different temperatures the sample can be placed in a furnace at constant temperature.
Perfect conditions are
- homogeneous material,
- a homogeneous energy input on the front side
- a time-dependent short pulse – in form of a Dirac delta function
Several improvements on the models have been made. In 1963 Cowan takes radiation and convection on the surface into account.[2] Cape and Lehman consider transient heat transfer, finite pulse effects and also heat losses in the same year.[3] Blumm and Opfermann improved the Cape-Lehman-Model with high order solutions of radial transient heat transfer and facial heat loss, non-linear regression routine in case of high heat losses and an advanced, patented pulse length correction.[4][5]
See also
References
- ^ W.J. Parker; R.J. Jenkins; C.P. Butler; G.L. Abbott (1961). "Method of Determining Thermal Diffusivity, Heat Capacity and Thermal Conductivity". Journal of Applied Physics. 32 (9): 1679. Bibcode:1961JAP....32.1679P. doi:10.1063/1.1728417.
- ^ R.D. Cowan (1963). "Pulse Method of Measuring Thermal Diffusivity at High Temperatures". Journal of Applied Physics. 34 (4): 926. Bibcode:1963JAP....34..926C. doi:10.1063/1.1729564.
- ^ J.A. Cape; G.W. Lehman (1963). "Temperature and Finite-Pulse-Time Effects in the Flash Method for Measuring Thermal Diffusivity". Journal of Applied Physics. 34 (7): 1909. Bibcode:1963JAP....34.1909C. doi:10.1063/1.1729711.
- ^ U.S. patent 7,038,209
- ^ J. Blumm; J. Opfermann (2002). "Improvement of the mathematical modeling of flash measurements". High Temperatures – High Pressures. 34 (5): 515. doi:10.1068/htjr061.