In this article, we are going to analyze in detail Louis Vialleton, a topic that has generated a great debate in contemporary society. Louis Vialleton is a topic of great relevance, since it affects a wide spectrum of the population and has repercussions on various aspects of daily life. Throughout this article, we will explore different perspectives on Louis Vialleton, with the aim of shedding light on its implications and generating deep reflection. From its origin to its possible solutions, including its short and long-term consequences, Louis Vialleton is a topic that deserves to be addressed with seriousness and rigor, which is why it is vitally important to delve into its analysis.
Louis Marius Vialleton (December 22, 1859 - December 18, 1929) was a French zoologist and writer, best known for his advocation of non-Darwinian evolution.
Vialleton attempted to refute gradual transformism from a morphological perspective in his work Morphologie générale Membres et ceintures des vertébrés tétrapodes: Critique morphotogique du transformisme (1924). Zoologist Étienne Rabaud responded with a critical article.
He contributed the chapter Morphologie et transformisme to the book Le Transformisme (1927). Vialleton's views were often misrepresented by creationists as anti-evolutionary. His writings were influential to creationists such as Douglas Dewar. However, he did not reject evolution. He was also incorrectly described as a critic of evolution by A. Morley Davies.
Un Problème de l'Évolution: La Théorie de la Récapitulation des Formes Ancestrales au Cours du Développement Embryonnaire (Loi Biogénétique Fondamentale de Haeckel) (1908)
Éléments de Morphologie des Vertébrés Anatomie et Embryologie Comparées, Paléontologie et Classification (1911)
Membres et ceintures des Vertébrés Tétrapodes: Critique morphologique du transformisme (1924)
Morphologie générale Membres et ceintures des vertébrés tétrapodes: Critique morphotogique du transformisme (1924)
Le Transformisme (1927)
L'origine Des Etres Vivants, L'illusion Transformiste (1929)
^Bowler, Peter J. (2001). Reconciling Science and Religion: The Debate in Early-Twentieth-Century Britain. University of Chicago Press. p. 396 ISBN0-226-06858-7
^ abEngels, Eve-Marie; Glick, Thomas F. (2008). The Reception of Charles Darwin in Europe, Volume 1. Continuum. pp. 341-242. ISBN978-0-8264-5833-9
^Rabaud, Étienne. (1924) 'Transformisme et morphologie', Bulletin biologique de la France et de la Belgique 58: 321-329.
^Normandin, Sebastian; Wolfe, Charles T. (2013). Vitalism and the Scientific Image in Post-Enlightenment Life Science, 1800-2010. p. 247. Springer. ISBN978-9400724440
^"Éléments de Morphologie des Vertébrés Anatomie et Embryologie Comparées, Paléontologie et Classification". Nature. 87 (2187): 412–413. 1911. doi:10.1038/087412a0. hdl:2027/uc1.b2939427.