The importance of Luke v Lyde in our contemporary society is undeniable. Since ancient times, Luke v Lyde has played a crucial role in the evolution of humanity. Whether as a subject of study in various academic disciplines, as a protagonist of social movements or as an emblematic figure in popular culture, Luke v Lyde has left an indelible mark on the history of the world. Its influence extends to all aspects of life, from politics to economics, through science, art and technology. In this article, we will delve into the fascinating universe of Luke v Lyde, exploring its impact on different spheres of modern life and reflecting on its relevance in the future.
Luke v Lyde (1759), 2 Burr 882, 97 ER 614 (KB) is an early judgment on the Law of the Sea.
A ship carrying fish from New Foundland to Lisbon, Portugal was captured by the French after 17 days of their voyage. The Sarah was recaptured by an English privateer three days later and taken to Bideford. the defendant received the fish and sold it in Bideford for half its value.
The issue before the court was:
Mansfield held that in the present case there was nothing to prevent freight from being due. "Freight became due from and upon the freighters taking the goods into their possession: and continued due, by the defendants not totally abandoning them."
Regarding how much freight was due Mansfield relied on what he termed "the ‘principles’ he instinctively ‘found’ in the common law" and ruled ""The master had come seventeen days of his voyage and was within four days of the destined port when the accident happened. Therefore he ought to be paid his freight for 17/21 parts of the full voyage for that half of the cargo that was saved."
The case is notable for establishing the dicta "that the maritime law is not the law of a particular country, but the general law of nations."
Lord Mansfields reasoning flows out of that the law of the sea began with the Rhodian Code, then the Consolato del Mere, the laws of Hanseatic League the Laws of Wisbuy and Ordinance of Louis 14th. From this Mansfield argues that there exists a set of internationally recognized practices in regard to law of the Sea.