Nowadays, Meta-organization has become a topic of great relevance in our society. Since its origins, Meta-organization has generated growing interest among researchers, academics and the general public. Its impact has been reflected in different areas, from culture to the economy, including politics and the environment. In this article, we will explore in depth the importance of Meta-organization, its evolution over time and its influence on our daily lives. In addition, we will analyze the different perspectives and opinions that exist around Meta-organization, in order to better understand its scope and consequences.
Meta-organization is defined as an organization with other organizations as its members. This concept was developed in 2005 by Göran Ahrne and Nils Brunsson.[1] They further elaborated and underpinned the concept theoretically in 2008[2] by focusing on explaining what difference it makes to have organizations as members instead of individuals.
Meta-organization studies focus broadly on questions related to how meta-organizations organize and function and what the consequences are thereof, more specifically, how, when and in which ways meta-organizations impact their members, non-members or society at large. More generally, it asks what kind of dynamic “having organizations as members” creates and what that means for how these organizations behave.
Those interested in the concept of meta-organization and developing theory explaining them have been gathering at the European Group of Organization Studies - EGOS colloquium, currently as a standing working group (https://www.egos.org/SWGs/SWG-01) and regularly engage at the International Sociology Association (ISA) conferences (particularly as part of RO17 – Sociology of Organizations). In addition, workshops and other gatherings are organized gathering those interested into one place. Updates on activities and publications are given on the LinkedIn group page (https://www.linkedin.com/groups/9391069/).
References
^Ahrne, Göran; Brunsson, Nils (2005). "Organizations and meta-organizations". Scandinavian Journal of Management. 4 (21): 429–449. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2005.09.005.
^Ahrne, Göran; Brunsson, Nils (2008). Meta-organizations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. ISBN978-91-47-70200-8.
^Berkowitz, Héloïse; Bor, Sanne; Brunsson, Nils (2026). A world of meta-organizations. Edward Elgar.
^Brankovic, Jelena (2018). "How Do Meta-organizations Affect Extra-organizational Boundaries? The Case of University Associations". Research in the Sociology of Organizations. 57: 259–281. doi:10.1108/S0733-558X20180000057010. ISBN978-1-78743-829-3.
^Vähä-Savo, Valtteri; Syväterä, Jukka; Tervonen-Gonçalves, Leena (2019). "The authority of meta-organisations: Making the international association of National Public Health Institutes attractive to prospective members". European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology. 6 (4): 474–502. doi:10.1080/23254823.2019.1612262.
^Berkowitz, Héloïse; Grothe-Hammer, Michael (2022). "From a Clash of Social Orders to a Loss of Decidability in Meta-organizations Tackling Grand Challenges: The Case of Japan Leaving the International Whaling Commission". Research in the Sociology of Organizations: 115–138. doi:10.1108/S0733-558X20220000079010. ISBN978-1-83909-829-1.
^Berkowitz, Heloise; Bor, Sanne (2024). "Meta-organizations for Sustainability Transformations: Navigating Tensions Between Imperatives of Transition and Meta-organizationality". Journal of Organizational Sociology. 2 (1): 29–58. doi:10.1515/joso-2023-0001. hdl:10230/60983.
^Berkowitz, Héloïse; Bor, Sanne (2018). "Why Meta-Organizations Matter: A Response to Lawton et al. and Spillman". Journal of Management Inquiry. 27 (2): 204–211. doi:10.1177/1056492617712895.
^Zyzak, Barbara; Jacobsen, Dag Ingvar (2020). "External managerial networking in meta-organizations. Evidence from regional councils in Norway". Public Management Review. 22 (9): 1347–1367. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1632922.
^Karlberg, Eva; Jacobsson, Kerstin (2015). "A Meta-organizational Perspective on the Europeanization of Civil Society: The Case of the Swedish Women's Lobby". VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 26 (4): 1438–1459. doi:10.1007/s11266-014-9463-0.
^Frandsen, Finn; Johansen, Winni (2018). "Voices in Conflict? The Crisis Communication of Meta-Organizations". Management Communication Quarterly. 32 (1): 90–120. doi:10.1177/0893318917705734.
^Vukasovic, Martina; Stensaker, Bjørn (2018). "University alliances in the Europe of knowledge: Positions, agendas and practices in policy processes". European Educational Research Journal. 17 (3): 349–364. doi:10.1177/1474904117724572. hdl:10852/62236.
^Zapp, Mike; Jungblut, Jens; Ramirez, Francisco O. (2021). "Legitimacy, stratification, and internationalization in global higher education: the case of the International Association of Universities". Tertiary Education and Management. 27 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1007/s11233-020-09062-0. hdl:10852/85604.
^Carmagnac, Liliane; Carbone, Valentina (2019). "Making supply networks more sustainable 'together': the role of meta-organisations". Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal. 20 (1): 56–67. doi:10.1080/16258312.2018.1554163.