Paul v NALGO
Nowadays, Paul v NALGO is a topic that has gained great relevance in today's society. For a long time, Paul v NALGO has been the subject of debate and research, arousing the interest of academics, specialists and people in general. This article aims to delve into the different aspects of Paul v NALGO, analyzing its impact on different aspects of daily life. Through an exhaustive analysis, we seek to provide the reader with detailed and updated information about Paul v NALGO, in order to promote a more complete and enriching understanding of this phenomenon.
| Paul v NALGO | |
|---|---|
.svg) | |
| Court | High Court of Justice |
| Citation(s) | IRLR 413 |
| Keywords | |
| Trade union, governance | |
Paul v NALGO IRLR 413 is a UK labour law case, concerning the governance of trade unions in the United Kingdom.
Facts
P and F, members of NALGO, claimed the union's publications against the Tories were unlawful under Trade Union Act 1913, section 3(3)(f) providing funds could not be used to persuade people to not vote for a candidate – unless there had been a political objects clause, under what is now Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, section 72(1)(f).
Judgment
Sir Nicolas Browne-Wilkinson VC held the literature was unlawful under the TUA 1913 s 3(3)(f) as its main purpose was to persuade people to not vote Tory, and so was unlawful.