In today's world, Protopelicanus remains a topic of great relevance and interest to a wide variety of people. Whether it is a current topic, a historical figure or a fundamental concept, Protopelicanus has the power to capture attention and generate debate in different areas. In this article, we will thoroughly explore the impact and importance of Protopelicanus, analyzing its implications in today's society and its relevance in different contexts. Likewise, we will examine how Protopelicanus has evolved over time and its influence on different aspects of our daily lives. Without a doubt, Protopelicanus is a fascinating topic that deserves to be analyzed carefully to better understand its importance in today's world.
This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. (August 2025) |
| Protopelicanus Temporal range: Late Eocene
| |
|---|---|
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Class: | Aves |
| Infraclass: | Neognathae |
| Order: | incertae sedis |
| Family: | incertae sedis |
| Genus: | †Protopelicanus Reichenbach, 1852[1] |
| Species: | †P. cuvierii
|
| Binomial name | |
| †Protopelicanus cuvierii Reichenbach, 1852
| |
Protopelicanus cuvierii is a putative fossil waterbird of uncertain affinities. It was briefly described and figured by Georges Cuvier in 1822 from Late Eocene material from Montmartre, France, though not formally described and named until 1852 by German botanist and ornithologist Ludwig Reichenbach as an early pelecanid. The original material comprised the cranial part of a left scapula and a nearly complete left femur. The lectotype femur was thought by Michel Brunet in 1970 to be typical of a pelican. However, Colin Harrison in 1979 considered that it belonged to the Sulidae, and Storrs Olson in 1995 thought it might be a pelagornithid. The femur is held by the Muséum national d'histoire naturelle in Paris (No.7978); the location of the scapular fragment is unknown.[1]