Tu banner alternativo

Protopelicanus

In today's world, Protopelicanus remains a topic of great relevance and interest to a wide variety of people. Whether it is a current topic, a historical figure or a fundamental concept, Protopelicanus has the power to capture attention and generate debate in different areas. In this article, we will thoroughly explore the impact and importance of Protopelicanus, analyzing its implications in today's society and its relevance in different contexts. Likewise, we will examine how Protopelicanus has evolved over time and its influence on different aspects of our daily lives. Without a doubt, Protopelicanus is a fascinating topic that deserves to be analyzed carefully to better understand its importance in today's world.

Tu banner alternativo

Protopelicanus
Temporal range: Late Eocene
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Aves
Infraclass: Neognathae
Order: incertae sedis
Family: incertae sedis
Genus: Protopelicanus
Reichenbach, 1852[1]
Species:
P. cuvierii
Binomial name
Protopelicanus cuvierii
Reichenbach, 1852

Protopelicanus cuvierii is a putative fossil waterbird of uncertain affinities. It was briefly described and figured by Georges Cuvier in 1822 from Late Eocene material from Montmartre, France, though not formally described and named until 1852 by German botanist and ornithologist Ludwig Reichenbach as an early pelecanid. The original material comprised the cranial part of a left scapula and a nearly complete left femur. The lectotype femur was thought by Michel Brunet in 1970 to be typical of a pelican. However, Colin Harrison in 1979 considered that it belonged to the Sulidae, and Storrs Olson in 1995 thought it might be a pelagornithid. The femur is held by the Muséum national d'histoire naturelle in Paris (No.7978); the location of the scapular fragment is unknown.[1]

References

  1. ^ a b Mlíkovský, Jiří (1995). "Nomenclatural and taxonomic status of fossil birds described by H. G. L. Reichenbach in 1852" (PDF). Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg. 181: 311–316. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-10-06. Retrieved 2012-05-05.