In this article, we will further explore Public Understanding of Science, a topic that has captured the attention of academics, experts, and enthusiasts alike. Public Understanding of Science is a topic of great relevance today and its importance extends to various areas, from science and technology to culture and society. Throughout this text, we will analyze the different aspects related to Public Understanding of Science, as well as its impact on the current world. From its origin to its evolution, through its influence in different areas, we will examine this fascinating topic in detail and discover the multiple facets that make it so relevant today.
![]() | |
| Discipline | Public awareness of science |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Edited by | Hans-Peter Peters (Research Center Jülich & Free University of Berlin, Germany) |
| Publication details | |
| History | 1992–present |
| Publisher | |
| Frequency | Bi-monthly |
| 2.754 (2-year), 3.100 (5-year) (2019) | |
| Standard abbreviations | |
| ISO 4 | Public Underst. Sci. |
| Indexing | |
| CODEN | PUNSEM |
| ISSN | 0963-6625 (print) 1361-6609 (web) |
| LCCN | 92658626 |
| OCLC no. | 36297216 |
| Links | |
Public Understanding of Science is a bimonthly peer-reviewed academic journal established in 1992 and published by SAGE Publications. It covers topics in the popular perception of science, the role of science in society, philosophy of science, science education, and science in public policy. The editor-in-chief is Hans-Peter Peters (Research Center Jülich & Free University of Berlin, Germany).
Public Understanding of Science is abstracted and indexed in Scopus and the Social Sciences Citation Index. According to the Journal Citation Reports, its 2019 2-year impact factor is 2.754, ranking it 13 out of 88 journals in the category "Communication"[1] and 2 out of 46 journals in the category "History & Philosophy of Science".[2]
Public Understanding of Science has been criticised for its lack of commitment to open access, given that it publishes research about public understanding and access to scientific knowledge. Journal editors have published reasons for their position in the journal.[3] However debate continues even within the journal's editorial team.[4]
John Durant, 1992-1997
Bruce V. Lewenstein, 1998-2003
Edna F. Einsiedel, 2004-2009
Martin W. Bauer, 2010-2015
Massimiano Bucchi, 2016-2019
Hans-Peter Peters, 2020–present
{{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
{{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)